[Submit] Submit button with manager email prompt

[hungvu193]

Explanation of Change

Add a new ReportSubmitTo Popover that will be shown when a member of submit workspace try to submit an expense.

Design doc section

Fixed Issues

$ #87264
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

Same as QA Steps

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."
Prerequisite: You're a member of a submit workspace.

Test 1: Expense view

1. Go to submit workspace and submit an expense.
2. Verify that a Popover appears and you're able to choose a manager to submit your expense to.
3. Choose a manager and press confirm.
4. Verify that you can submit your expense.
5. Create another expense and click on it to see detail
6. Try to submit expense from Submit header button
7. Verify they you can choose a manager and submit expense.

Test 2: Search view

1. Go to submit workspace
2. Go to search (Spend) and try to submit that expense.
3. Verify that a Popover appears and you're able to choose a manager to submit your expense to.

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

• I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
  • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
  • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
  • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
  • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
• I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
• I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
  • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
  • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
  • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
  • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
  • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
• If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
• I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
• I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
• I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
• If any new file was added I verified that:
  • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
• If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • A similar style doesn't already exist
  • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
• If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
  • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
  • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
• If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
• If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
• If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
  • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
  • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
• If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
• I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
• If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Screen.Recording.2026-05-27.at.17.19.12.mov

Android: mWeb Chrome

Screen.Recording.2026-05-27.at.17.22.55.mov

iOS: Native

Screen.Recording.2026-05-27.at.17.09.33.mov

iOS: mWeb Safari

Screen.Recording.2026-05-27.at.17.11.41.mov

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Screen.Recording.2026-05-26.at.22.30.54.mov

[melvin-bot]

Hey, I noticed you changed src/languages/en.ts in a PR from a fork. For security reasons, translations are not generated automatically for PRs from forks.

If you want to automatically generate translations for other locales, an Expensify employee will have to:

1. Look at the code and make sure there are no malicious changes.
2. Run the Generate static translations GitHub workflow. If you have write access and the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Alternatively, if you are an external contributor, you can run the translation script locally with your own OpenAI API key. To learn more, try running:

npx ts-node ./scripts/generateTranslations.ts --help

Typically, you'd want to translate only what you changed by running npx ts-node ./scripts/generateTranslations.ts --compare-ref main

[hungvu193]

Note

Confirm to check if we also need to show popup with submit action on Search - submitMoneyRequestOnSearch

[iwiznia]

What's holding this up?

[hungvu193]

Ideally we should hold it for oboarding PR since there is no way to create submit WS for now. I can resume the progress today.

[iwiznia]

since there is no way to create submit WS for now

You can create one from the oldDot pricing page

[hungvu193]

I see. That's helpful 👍 currently I need to checkout onboarding existing PR to onboard on create one then switching back 😅

[hungvu193]

@MelvinBot Assign yourself to this PR, merge main and revert the changes from Mobile-Expensify.

[MelvinBot]

Done! I've:

1. Assigned myself to this PR
2. Merged main into feat-87264 — resolved merge conflicts in src/libs/actions/IOU/ReportWorkflow.ts (kept your manager email logic, integrated with main's getSubmitToAccountID)
3. Reverted Mobile-Expensify submodule pointer back to main's version

[MelvinBot]

⏱️ Ran out of time before I could finish. This usually means the task was too complex or I got stuck exploring. Please try again with a more specific request or post in #melvinbot-ai.

Run details

[hungvu193]

Will work on this issue this weekend, currently focusing on Gate Submit feature PR.

[iwiznia]

@hungvu193 have you picked this back up?

[hungvu193]

I'm on it now.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/CONST/index.ts	93.84% <ø> (ø)
.../MoneyRequestReportView/SelectionToolbar/index.tsx	76.59% <ø> (ø)
...chList/ListItem/ExpenseReportListItemRow/index.tsx	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...earch/SearchList/ListItem/ReportListItemHeader.tsx	91.30% <100.00%> (+0.82%)	⬆️
.../TransactionListItem/TransactionListItemNarrow.tsx	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...em/TransactionListItem/TransactionListItemWide.tsx	0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/components/TransactionItemRow/index.tsx	83.33% <100.00%> (+0.25%)	⬆️
src/hooks/useSelectionModeReportActions.ts	86.36% <100.00%> (+0.48%)	⬆️
src/libs/PersonalDetailsUtils.ts	80.85% <100.00%> (+0.24%)	⬆️
src/pages/Search/SearchPage.tsx	85.71% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 16 more
... and 126 files with indirect coverage changes

[garrettmknight]

BUG: if i choose the current user as the manager... the approve button doesn't show up

This is intentional so they're encouraged to actually submit the report to someone else to give us the opportunity to convert the company, not just the one submitter.

[abzokhattab]

hmmm but in a new workspace when i create an expense and submit, i see the current account present

is that expected?

Screen.Recording.2026-06-19.at.12.24.18.mov

[abzokhattab]

@hungvu193 lgtm ... there are pending cleanup issues here #87998 (comment)

[iwiznia]

If @hungvu193 can apply those cleanups before @carlosmiceli reviews, then fine, otherwise let's send that in a new PR so we can unblock other issues/PRs depending on this.

[github-actions]

🚧 @carlosmiceli has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

[OSBotify]

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

[github-actions]

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪
Built from App PR #87998.

Android 🤖	iOS 🍎
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/rock-artifacts/ad-hoc/rock-android-Adhoc-ca3e2d5c529-aa5daf5-806f0e924e721966bc2c3bb2c57070c52ccd721a/index.html	https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/rock-artifacts/ad-hoc/rock-ios-device-AdHoc-ca3e2d5-aa5daf5-aa6dcb30a31407d93b957c1ad2eeea994c7321b6/index.html

Web 🕸️
https://87998.pr-testing.expensify.com

---

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

[OSBotify]

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/carlosmiceli in version: 9.4.17-0 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

• Android
• iOS

[mitarachim]

Deploy Blocker #94254 was identified to be related to this PR.

[hungvu193]

Deploy Blocker #94254 was identified to be related to this PR.

I don't think so because I don't notice it during working on this PR. I think there was another PR was merged that might affect it.

[jponikarchuk]

Deploy Blocker #94281 was identified to be related to this PR.

[jponikarchuk]

Deploy Blocker #94304 was identified to be related to this PR.

[mitarachim]

Deploy Blocker #94323 was identified to be related to this PR.

[jponikarchuk]

Deploy Blocker #94347 was identified to be related to this PR.

[OSBotify]

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/blimpich in version: 9.4.17-3 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	failure ❌

[OSBotify]

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/blimpich in version: 9.4.17-3 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	failure ❌