Skip to content

Fix - Pressing enter twice on selecting currency from search closes the send money/request money option #18265#18853

Merged
alex-mechler merged 6 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
AmjedNazzal:Issue18265
May 15, 2023
Merged

Fix - Pressing enter twice on selecting currency from search closes the send money/request money option #18265#18853
alex-mechler merged 6 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
AmjedNazzal:Issue18265

Conversation

@AmjedNazzal

@AmjedNazzal AmjedNazzal commented May 12, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Details

Fixes the issue with pressing Enter multiple times on selecting currency closing the entire modal by adding a logic to detect multiple fast Enter presses and handling it properly to prevent the issue behaviour.

Fixed Issues

$ #18265
PROPOSAL: #18265 (comment)

Tests

  1. Click on the + icon to open the popoverMenu.
  2. Click on Send Money or Request Money.
  3. Click on the currency to open the currency selection menu.
  4. Type in a currency and double press enter fast.
  5. Notice that the modal doesn't close completely and you're still in the send/request money page.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same steps as the Tests

QA Steps

Same steps as the Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screen.Recording.2023-05-12.at.2.03.44.PM.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
Screen.Recording.2023-05-12.at.7.42.51.PM.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-05-12.at.7.39.38.PM.mov
Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-05-12.at.2.01.41.PM.mov
iOS
Screen.Recording.2023-05-12.at.2.52.26.PM.mov
Android
Screen.Recording.2023-05-12.at.3.25.51.PM.mov

@AmjedNazzal AmjedNazzal requested a review from a team as a code owner May 12, 2023 17:39
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested review from abdulrahuman5196 and alex-mechler and removed request for a team May 12, 2023 17:39
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented May 12, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@alex-mechler @abdulrahuman5196 One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Comment thread src/components/OptionsSelector/BaseOptionsSelector.js Outdated
Comment thread src/components/OptionsSelector/BaseOptionsSelector.js Outdated
@AmjedNazzal

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@abdulrahuman5196 both points duly noted, I will fix them now

Comment thread src/components/OptionsSelector/BaseOptionsSelector.js
@AmjedNazzal

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@abdulrahuman5196 Adjustments have been applied

@abdulrahuman5196

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@AmjedNazzal Thanks for the making the changes. On high level looks good to me. Will work on Reviewer's checklist tomorrow morning and will request if any more changes are required.

Comment thread src/components/OptionsSelector/BaseOptionsSelector.js Outdated
Comment thread src/components/OptionsSelector/BaseOptionsSelector.js Outdated
@abdulrahuman5196

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Apart from the code.

  1. PR details section would be represent what the issue is and how we are trying to solve. I think the PR details is talking more about why we didn't choose InteractionManager which is a sub-part of the issue. I feel its more of a PR comment than a PR details section thing. I would suggest to mention the issue and actual fix itself on high level first then more statements if required.
  2. you could resolve the review comments once they are fixed to avoid noise in GH.

@AmjedNazzal AmjedNazzal force-pushed the Issue18265 branch 2 times, most recently from c11179e to 0f222ef Compare May 13, 2023 09:43
@AmjedNazzal

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@abdulrahuman5196 I actually did feel like 300 was too low but also I didn't want to affect cases where "canSelectMultipleOptions" is true too much, so thank you for letting me know I can seperate the two and handle only the case where canSelectMultipleOptions is false, I have updated the commit to seperate the two cases and increased 300 to 500 which felt like a good time when I tried to rapidly press Enter.

@AmjedNazzal

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I have also changed the PR Details section to remove the long explanation

@abdulrahuman5196

abdulrahuman5196 commented May 13, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Untitled.mp4
Mobile Web - Chrome
az_recorder_20230513_205828.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
ScreenRecording.mov
Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-05-13.at.8.19.34.PM.mov
iOS
Screen.Recording.2023-05-13.at.8.27.39.PM.mov
Android
Untitled.mp4

@abdulrahuman5196

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@AmjedNazzal In author's checklist, offline tests is also same as tests? Could you update that

@AmjedNazzal

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@abdulrahuman5196 Yes sorry I've updated that, the tests are all the same

@abdulrahuman5196 abdulrahuman5196 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@alex-mechler Changes looks good to me and completed reviewer checklist as well - #18853 (comment)

@alex-mechler alex-mechler left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the quick work here!

@alex-mechler alex-mechler merged commit 0b6168b into Expensify:main May 15, 2023
@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/alex-mechler in version: 1.3.15-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/yuwenmemon in version: 1.3.15-12 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants