Skip to content

Automate Codex ↔ Claude review kickoff for agent PRs#4

Merged
cursor[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/agent-pr-review-workflow-0cc0
May 27, 2026
Merged

Automate Codex ↔ Claude review kickoff for agent PRs#4
cursor[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/agent-pr-review-workflow-0cc0

Conversation

@scalinity

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Prevents agent PRs from landing without a Codex/Claude review debate (as happened on #3).

Changes

  • .github/workflows/agent-pr-review-kickoff.yml — On cursor/* PR open/ready/reopen, posts a kickoff comment with @codex review and @claude (deduped via HTML marker). Supports workflow_dispatch for existing PRs.
  • AGENTS.md — Review guidelines for Codex and debate expectations for Claude.
  • .github/pull_request_template.md — Reminds authors about automatic agent review.

Merge priority

Recommend merging this before or alongside #3 so future Cursor PRs auto-kickoff review.

Slack Thread

Open in Web Open in Cursor 

Automatically post @codex review and @claude debate prompts when Cursor
opens PRs on cursor/* branches. Includes AGENTS.md review guidelines,
PR template reminder, and workflow_dispatch for retroactive kickoff.

Co-authored-by: Daniel Escalante <scalinity@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented May 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@scalinity, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 37 minutes and 34 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: f5bf4387-02db-4bdf-9294-a401e0f03170

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between da0052b and 02686b8.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/pull_request_template.md
  • .github/workflows/agent-pr-review-kickoff.yml
  • AGENTS.md
  • README.md

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@cursor cursor Bot merged commit 9e563e8 into main May 27, 2026
1 check failed
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • Updated the kickoff comment template so links to AGENTS.md and the workflow file use the repository’s actual default branch (context.payload.repository.default_branch) instead of hard-coding main, which prevents broken links in repos that use a different default branch name. .github/workflows/agent-pr-review-kickoff.ymlL114-L117
  • Committed the change on the current branch with commit f6cb953.
  • Created a follow-up PR entry via make_pr titled “Fix kickoff comment links to respect repository default branch”.

Testing

  • git diff -- .github/workflows/agent-pr-review-kickoff.yml
  • git commit -m "Use default branch in kickoff workflow links"
  • nl -ba .github/workflows/agent-pr-review-kickoff.yml | sed -n '100,135p'

View task →

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants