docs: complete agent PR review workflow documentation#14
Conversation
Documents manual workflow_dispatch path and PR-comment fallback when a cursor/* PR predates the agent-pr-review-kickoff workflow on main. Co-authored-by: Daniel Escalante <scalinity@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Important Review skippedReview was skipped due to path filters ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
Comment |
Agent review debateThis pull request was opened by an automated agent (Cursor Cloud Agent). Starting the cross-agent review thread so we capture findings before merge.
@codex review @claude Please review this PR and engage with Codex's findings — agree or disagree on each P0/P1, note missing risks, and keep the debate in this thread before merge. Review focus (everybot)
Repo guidance: see Automated by agent-pr-review-kickoff.yml · PR: #14 |
|
To use Codex here, create a Codex account and connect to github. |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🚀 ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
Resolve README conflict: keep bootstrap README and License from main, retain retroactive agent review kickoff instructions from this branch. Co-authored-by: Daniel Escalante <scalinity@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary
The agent PR review kickoff workflow is already on
main(merged via #4–#11). This PR completes the README with retroactive kickoff instructions from the harness spec: merge workflow first, use Actions → Agent review kickoff with a PR number, or post@codex review+@claudein a PR comment (not description-only).Already on
main(no code changes in this PR)AGENTS.md.github/workflows/agent-pr-review-kickoff.yml.github/pull_request_template.mdREADME.md(this PR extends)Workflow behavior
pull_request(opened,ready_for_review,reopened,synchronize,edited) when head ref iscursor/*workflow_dispatchwithpr_numberfor retroactive runs<!-- agent-review-kickoff -->marker@codex review+@claudedebate prompt perAGENTS.mdValidation
actionlintpasses onagent-pr-review-kickoff.ymlgithub-actions[bot](validatescursor/*trigger)Agent review
@codex @claude — review this PR; the kickoff comment on this thread should trigger the cross-agent debate.
Slack Thread