Skip to content

docs: complete agent PR review workflow documentation#14

Merged
scalinity merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
cursor/agent-pr-review-workflow-413e
May 27, 2026
Merged

docs: complete agent PR review workflow documentation#14
scalinity merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
cursor/agent-pr-review-workflow-413e

Conversation

@scalinity

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

The agent PR review kickoff workflow is already on main (merged via #4#11). This PR completes the README with retroactive kickoff instructions from the harness spec: merge workflow first, use Actions → Agent review kickoff with a PR number, or post @codex review + @claude in a PR comment (not description-only).

Already on main (no code changes in this PR)

Deliverable Path
Review + debate rules AGENTS.md
Kickoff workflow .github/workflows/agent-pr-review-kickoff.yml
PR template reminder .github/pull_request_template.md
README overview README.md (this PR extends)

Workflow behavior

  • Triggers on pull_request (opened, ready_for_review, reopened, synchronize, edited) when head ref is cursor/*
  • workflow_dispatch with pr_number for retroactive runs
  • Deduped via <!-- agent-review-kickoff --> marker
  • Posts @codex review + @claude debate prompt per AGENTS.md

Validation

  • actionlint passes on agent-pr-review-kickoff.yml
  • This PR should receive one kickoff comment from github-actions[bot] (validates cursor/* trigger)
  • @codex and @claude debate in-thread before merge

Agent review

@codex @claude — review this PR; the kickoff comment on this thread should trigger the cross-agent debate.

Slack Thread

Open in Web Open in Cursor 

Documents manual workflow_dispatch path and PR-comment fallback when
a cursor/* PR predates the agent-pr-review-kickoff workflow on main.

Co-authored-by: Daniel Escalante <scalinity@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented May 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped due to path filters

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • README.md is excluded by none and included by none

CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including **/dist/** will override the default block on the dist directory, by removing the pattern from both the lists.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 085bd02a-4b5c-416b-8a7b-6d546929577f

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Agent review debate

This pull request was opened by an automated agent (Cursor Cloud Agent). Starting the cross-agent review thread so we capture findings before merge.

Note: This PR is still a draft. Mark it ready for review when you want CodeRabbit and full CI gates to run; Codex and Claude can still respond below.

@codex review

@claude Please review this PR and engage with Codex's findings — agree or disagree on each P0/P1, note missing risks, and keep the debate in this thread before merge.

Review focus (everybot)

  • Slack scopes, token handling, and Socket Mode deployment
  • /idea channel gating and message handler edge cases
  • Tests and docs staying aligned with docs/SETUP.md

Repo guidance: see AGENTS.md.


Automated by agent-pr-review-kickoff.yml · PR: #14

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

To use Codex here, create a Codex account and connect to github.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🚀

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@scalinity scalinity marked this pull request as ready for review May 27, 2026 14:04
Resolve README conflict: keep bootstrap README and License from main,
retain retroactive agent review kickoff instructions from this branch.

Co-authored-by: Daniel Escalante <scalinity@users.noreply.github.com>
@scalinity scalinity merged commit 0364db1 into main May 27, 2026
2 checks passed
@cursor cursor Bot deleted the cursor/agent-pr-review-workflow-413e branch May 27, 2026 16:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants