CPVM: use X509ExtendedTrustManager to skip hostname verification#5419
Conversation
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@weizhouapache a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result: ✖️ el7 ✖️ el8 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 1175 |
|
Hi @coreymr can you please test with the following file in CPVM ? |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@weizhouapache a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ debian. SL-JID 1177 |
|
@rhtyd @nvazquez Mike has confirmed it fixes his console issue on vmware 7. |
|
Thanks @weizhouapache, @rhtyd can this be included on 4.15.2? |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@nvazquez a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ debian. SL-JID 1184 |
|
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-70u1 |
|
@nvazquez a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-70u1) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
@rhtyd @weizhouapache I think this is not a blocker, no need to include it on 4.15.2, do you agree? |
|
Trillian test result (tid-1992)
|
|
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-70u1 |
|
@nvazquez a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-70u1) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
cc @DaanHoogland @nvazquez @davidjumani - do we know what causes so many smoketest failures with Vmware7, can we fix them? |
yadvr
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM - did not test it, this would require some manual testing + 100% smoketests pass before merging.
|
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-65u2 |
|
@weizhouapache a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-65u2) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
@rhtyd @weizhouapache I've started a Vmware7 round of tests on the health check PR so we can compare if the failures are related to this PR or needs fixing |
|
@rhtyd @weizhouapache this fix has been tested by @coreymr, do we need additional tests? |
|
@nvazquez yes my concern is not specifically VMware7, but other regression testing hypervisors/version combinations (with/without SSL enabled?) - if it breaks anything? Or do you or @weizhouapache think that's not necessary? |
@rhtyd |
|
Thanks for confirming @weizhouapache |
|
(just curious why XenServer65? and what about Vmware 6.5/6.7?) |
@rhtyd sorry for typo. centos7 (ssl), ubuntu20 (non-ssl), vmware65 (non-ssl) and xenserver71 (non-ssl). |
|
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-70u1 keepEnv |
|
@weizhouapache a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-70u1) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
Trillian test result (tid-2068)
|
|
@rhtyd @nvazquez only the first ssh connection is ok, the next ssh attempts are refused. (it seems to be working in vmware65 environments) for default centos55 template, it works When I use centos55 for testing, tests passed. |
|
@NuxRo any input on this strange behaviour with macchinina and Vmware 7? |
@NuxRo |
|
@nvazquez @sureshanaparti |
|
@weizhouapache not before we have some agreement on the vmware failures (4.15 is fine, but I wonder if somebody will do a 4.15.3 as we'll soon have 4.16.0, 4.16.1 and 4.17.0 in the pipeline) |
|
ping @NuxRo @nvazquez @weizhouapache - kindly discuss and agree on whether this can be merged or some fixes in this PR or in trillian/lab env is needed. |
@rhtyd |
|
Agree with @weizhouapache, the failures are not related to the PR as the same were seen in the health checks PR, lets merge it and fix the issues for macchinina and Vmware 7 on a separate PR |
|
For those who have same issue with 4.15.2.0, please use the jar below in SSVM |
Description
This PR fixes #5413
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?