This repository was archived by the owner on May 22, 2025. It is now read-only.
Conversation
Member
|
Going to get real boring real fast |
Bibby0110
suggested changes
Aug 3, 2021
Contributor
Bibby0110
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All the times need changing to use the defines
New procs need autodoccing
Contributor
|
personally think it's a weird bloaty way to include a moja reference |
Contributor
|
unfunny and bluepilled |
JamieD1
approved these changes
Aug 12, 2021
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Github documenting your Pull Request
Funny bus
Darkspawn ascend, but its moja
Chestburst, but its moja