Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency polyfill to 10.8.1#6175

Merged
thomhurst merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/polyfill-10.x
Jun 7, 2026
Merged

chore(deps): update dependency polyfill to 10.8.1#6175
thomhurst merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/polyfill-10.x

Conversation

@thomhurst

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
Polyfill nuget patch 10.8.010.8.1

Release Notes

SimonCropp/Polyfill (Polyfill)

v10.8.1

Compare Source

  • #​555 struct Range: invalid parameter names
  • #​556 struct Range: invalid parameter names

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate.

@thomhurst thomhurst added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file PATCH renovate-bot labels Jun 7, 2026
@thomhurst
thomhurst enabled auto-merge (squash) June 7, 2026 13:04

@claude claude Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review: Polyfill 10.8.0 → 10.8.1

This is a Renovate-generated patch bump for the Polyfill dependency.

Change: Directory.Packages.props — single line version bump from 10.8.0 to 10.8.1.

Assessment: Approved ✓

The patch release (10.8.1) fixes two issues with invalid parameter names in the struct Range polyfill (#555, #556). This is a pure bug-fix patch with no breaking changes or new API surface.

  • The single-line diff in Directory.Packages.props is correct and minimal.
  • No code changes needed — the fix is entirely inside the Polyfill package itself.
  • Patch bumps of this nature are safe to automerge and require no architectural concern.

Nothing to flag.

@codacy-production

codacy-production Bot commented Jun 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

🟢 Metrics 0 complexity

Metric Results
Complexity 0

View in Codacy

NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

@thomhurst
thomhurst force-pushed the renovate/polyfill-10.x branch from 1aed1f0 to c1f2775 Compare June 7, 2026 14:16

@claude claude Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review Update

Revisiting this PR — the diff is unchanged since the previous review and all findings still hold.

Change: — single-line version bump Polyfill 10.8.0 → 10.8.1.

Assessment: LGTM ✓

The 10.8.1 patch release fixes invalid parameter names in the struct Range polyfill (#555, #556). This is a pure bug fix with no breaking changes, no new API surface, and no code changes required on the TUnit side. The minimal single-line update to Directory.Packages.props is correct.

No issues to flag. Safe to automerge.

@claude claude Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review Update

Revisiting this PR — the diff is unchanged since the previous review and all findings still hold.

Change: Directory.Packages.props — single-line version bump Polyfill 10.8.0 → 10.8.1.

Assessment: LGTM

The 10.8.1 patch release fixes invalid parameter names in the struct Range polyfill (#555, #556). This is a pure bug fix with no breaking changes, no new API surface, and no code changes required on the TUnit side. The minimal single-line update to Directory.Packages.props is correct.

No issues to flag. Safe to automerge.

This was referenced Jul 9, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file PATCH renovate-bot

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants