Skip to content

ci: update workflows on release/26.4-lts#325

Open
fluentdo-ci wants to merge 1 commit into
release/26.4-ltsfrom
ci_update_workflows-release/26.4-lts
Open

ci: update workflows on release/26.4-lts#325
fluentdo-ci wants to merge 1 commit into
release/26.4-ltsfrom
ci_update_workflows-release/26.4-lts

Conversation

@fluentdo-ci

@fluentdo-ci fluentdo-ci commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Update workflows automatically on release/26.4-lts

@fluentdo-ci fluentdo-ci requested a review from a team as a code owner June 5, 2026 13:27
@fluentdo-ci fluentdo-ci enabled auto-merge (squash) June 5, 2026 13:27
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

OpenSSF Scorecard

PackageVersionScoreDetails
actions/actions/checkout df4cb1c069e1874edd31b4311f1884172cec0e10 🟢 5.9
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review🟢 10all changesets reviewed
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Maintained⚠️ 23 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Pinned-Dependencies🟢 3dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
License🟢 10license file detected
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Security-Policy🟢 9security policy file detected
SAST🟢 8SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
Branch-Protection🟢 5branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
actions/actions/checkout df4cb1c069e1874edd31b4311f1884172cec0e10 🟢 5.9
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review🟢 10all changesets reviewed
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Maintained⚠️ 23 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Pinned-Dependencies🟢 3dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
License🟢 10license file detected
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Security-Policy🟢 9security policy file detected
SAST🟢 8SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
Branch-Protection🟢 5branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
actions/actions/checkout df4cb1c069e1874edd31b4311f1884172cec0e10 🟢 5.9
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review🟢 10all changesets reviewed
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Maintained⚠️ 23 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Pinned-Dependencies🟢 3dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
License🟢 10license file detected
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Security-Policy🟢 9security policy file detected
SAST🟢 8SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
Branch-Protection🟢 5branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
actions/actions/checkout df4cb1c069e1874edd31b4311f1884172cec0e10 🟢 5.9
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review🟢 10all changesets reviewed
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Maintained⚠️ 23 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Pinned-Dependencies🟢 3dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
License🟢 10license file detected
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Security-Policy🟢 9security policy file detected
SAST🟢 8SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
Branch-Protection🟢 5branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches

Scanned Files

  • .github/workflows/call-build-windows-packages.yaml
  • .github/workflows/dependency-review.yml
  • .github/workflows/test.yaml
  • .github/workflows/update-version.yaml

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issues found across 1 file

Confidence score: 5/5

  • Automated review surfaced no issues in the provided summaries.
  • No files require special attention.

Re-trigger cubic

Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@fluentdo-ci fluentdo-ci force-pushed the ci_update_workflows-release/26.4-lts branch from 96d1fbf to df09d85 Compare June 16, 2026 13:06
@coveralls

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage Report for CI Build 27619713967

Coverage decreased (-0.002%) to 56.273%

Details

  • Coverage decreased (-0.002%) from the base build.
  • Patch coverage: No coverable lines changed in this PR.
  • 5 coverage regressions across 2 files.

Uncovered Changes

No uncovered changes found.

Coverage Regressions

5 previously-covered lines in 2 files lost coverage.

File Lines Losing Coverage Coverage
src/flb_http_client.c 3 42.76%
src/flb_scheduler.c 2 66.11%

Coverage Stats

Coverage Status
Relevant Lines: 152030
Covered Lines: 86712
Line Coverage: 57.04%
Relevant Branches: 33641
Covered Branches: 17771
Branch Coverage: 52.83%
Branches in Coverage %: Yes
Coverage Strength: 5760.42 hits per line

💛 - Coveralls

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants