Do we need onservicechanged?

[marcoscaceres]

If we have onserviceadded and onserviceremove, then why do we need onservicechanged?

[marcoscaceres]

ah, crap... got bit by the naming :)

[marcoscaceres]

Actually, we should rename this one ondefaultchanged

[efullea]

+1 to change it. I proposed it in #100 and a week after discussing it, it is already causing confusion.

[marcoscaceres]

heh, yeah :) it made sense the other day to keep it for some reason. Looking at it independently it seems ok, but when looked at in the context of the other two names, it gets confusing.

[marcoscaceres]

Actually, if we have defaultServiceId, then we don't need the events, because one can just Object.observe() defaultServiceId.

[zolkis]

Object.observe() is a good pattern, finally. We should spread its use in the spec...

[marcoscaceres]

I'm asking if it's something we can use... by doesn't seem we can watch properties, only simple objects :(

Started a thread here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-script-coord/2013AprJun/0702.html

[marcoscaceres]

Looks like no go on object.observe. Closing this bug. Will update the name of the event handler attribute.