Skip to content

Making small change so that this can play nice with SQLiteCipher.swift - #389

Closed
gblotter wants to merge 3 commits into
stephencelis:masterfrom
gblotter:SQLiteCipher-play-nice
Closed

Making small change so that this can play nice with SQLiteCipher.swift#389
gblotter wants to merge 3 commits into
stephencelis:masterfrom
gblotter:SQLiteCipher-play-nice

Conversation

@gblotter

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Needed to make func check() be public, so that SQLiteCipher.swift can access it in it's extension of the Connection class.

Please let me know what questions you have. if there is a better way of doing this, I'm open to suggestions. If you want to check out the details of the PR I have coming for the SQLiteCipher.swift repository, that uses this change, you can check it out here: https://github.com/gblotter/SQLite.swift/tree/SQLiteCipher-play-nice

@gblotter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@stephencelis Any chance you've had a second to check out this PR? 😊

@stephencelis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Not yet, sorry! Will try to find some time later today.

@stephencelis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@gblotter Do you have a link to your use in SQLiteCipher?

@gblotter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@stephencelis yeah, there is a a PR waiting for you in the repo w/ my use.

stephencelis/SQLiteCipher.swift#12

@pepejeria

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Any chance of having this minor PR reviewed? Would be great to have SQLiteCipher sorted out. Thanks

@TheNephilim88

Copy link
Copy Markdown

+1

@multiholle

Copy link
Copy Markdown

bump

jberkel added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2016
@jberkel

jberkel commented Nov 16, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This is now part of #531

@jberkel jberkel closed this Nov 16, 2016
@jberkel jberkel added this to the 0.11.1 milestone Nov 16, 2016
jberkel added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants