Skip to content

Make IStore available via ISpecificationContext#2064

Merged
leonard84 merged 4 commits into
spockframework:masterfrom
leonard84:store-extensions
Dec 28, 2024
Merged

Make IStore available via ISpecificationContext#2064
leonard84 merged 4 commits into
spockframework:masterfrom
leonard84:store-extensions

Conversation

@leonard84

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
  • Make IStore available via SpecificationContext
  • Change IBlockListener to receive...

@leonard84 leonard84 self-assigned this Dec 28, 2024
@leonard84 leonard84 changed the title store extensions Make IStore available via ISpecificationContext Dec 28, 2024
@leonard84 leonard84 marked this pull request as ready for review December 28, 2024 15:03
@leonard84

leonard84 commented Dec 28, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Since #1575 hasn't been released yet, I'm only adding a release notes entry for the store part.

@leonard84 leonard84 added this to the 2.4-M5 milestone Dec 28, 2024
@leonard84 leonard84 enabled auto-merge (squash) December 28, 2024 15:09
the current `Specification` instance instead of just the
`IterationInfo`.
This gives access to the `ISpecificationContext` as well
as potential fields.
For example, this could be used to trigger screenshots in a `Geb` spec.

@AndreasTu AndreasTu left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@leonard84 leonard84 merged commit 869542a into spockframework:master Dec 28, 2024
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Dec 28, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 90.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 81.90%. Comparing base (2c7db77) to head (ca6ded6).
Report is 182 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ockframework/runtime/extension/IBlockListener.java 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #2064      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     80.44%   81.90%   +1.45%     
- Complexity     4337     4688     +351     
============================================
  Files           441      452      +11     
  Lines         13534    14671    +1137     
  Branches       1707     1845     +138     
============================================
+ Hits          10888    12016    +1128     
+ Misses         2008     1975      -33     
- Partials        638      680      +42     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...java/org/spockframework/compiler/SpecRewriter.java 93.89% <100.00%> (+0.20%) ⬆️
...org/spockframework/runtime/PlatformSpecRunner.java 93.35% <100.00%> (-0.25%) ⬇️
...g/spockframework/runtime/SpecificationContext.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
.../java/org/spockframework/runtime/SpockRuntime.java 84.18% <100.00%> (+4.05%) ⬆️
...java/org/spockframework/runtime/StoreProvider.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ockframework/runtime/extension/IBlockListener.java 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 23 files with indirect coverage changes

@leonard84 leonard84 deleted the store-extensions branch December 28, 2024 20:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants