fix: remove unused parameters in co_occurence

[selmanozleyen]

fixes: #1110 and #1048 .

n_splits usage was removed here 32789ae

[flying-sheep]

this will break code that uses these parameters – sure they are unused, but you could warn first that they do nothing and will be removed, and then remove them later,

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 78.57143% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 72.96%. Comparing base (240dcfe) to head (7c4fec7).
⚠️ Report is 27 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/squidpy/_utils.py	72.72%	2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1121   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   72.96%   72.96%           
=======================================
  Files          38       38           
  Lines        6484     6496   +12     
  Branches     1151     1153    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits         4731     4740    +9     
- Misses       1270     1272    +2     
- Partials      483      484    +1     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/squidpy/gr/_ppatterns.py	78.01% <100.00%> (+0.09%)	⬆️
src/squidpy/_utils.py	57.21% <72.72%> (+0.96%)	⬆️

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[timtreis]

lgtm

[durr1602]

just a quick question, was there anything else to replace the progress bar? i'm not even sure there was one with the squidpy version I'm testing, but with this new version there doesn't seem to be any sort of log (at least on my end).

[selmanozleyen]

It should log something at least looking at "start = logg.info(f"Calculating co-occurrence probabilities for {len(interval)} intervals")". Maybe you should check stderr?

[durr1602]

Yes, that's what I'd thought as well.. weird. I'm running a Jupyter notebook in Positron. I've tried both the new Positron notebook editor (which is still under active dev I believe) and the legacy editor, but no output with either. I tried to capture both stdout and stderr using the magic %%capture but both are empty..

I thought I'd just ask, if the issue is not reproducible on your end, it's not that big of a deal. Let me know if you think it warrants opening an issue.