Revert "implement From<Vec<char>> and From<&'a [char]> for String"#36685
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Sep 24, 2016
Merged
Revert "implement From<Vec<char>> and From<&'a [char]> for String"#36685bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
From<Vec<char>> and From<&'a [char]> for String"#36685bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
This reverts commit ac73335.
brson
added
beta-nominated
Contributor
|
r? @aturon (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 2e02803 has been approved by |
Contributor
Author
|
@bors r=sfackler |
Collaborator
|
💡 This pull request was already approved, no need to approve it again.
|
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 2e02803 has been approved by |
Merged
brson
removed
the
beta-nominated
Collaborator
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2016
Revert "implement `From<Vec<char>>` and `From<&'a [char]>` for `String`" This reverts commit ac73335. This is a revert of #35054, which resulted in at least 7 known regressions, reported [here](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/regression-report-stable-2016-08-16-vs-beta-2016-09-21/4119) and [here](#36352), which will hit stable next week. I think this breakage was somewhat unanticipated, and we did not realize so many crates were broken until this week, so reverting is the conservative thing to do until we figure out how not to cause so much breakage. I've run crater on the revert and did not find any new breakage from the revert. Fixes #36352 cc @pwoolcoc @rust-lang/libs
Collaborator
bluss
added
the
relnotes
|
:( @brson was there something I should have done before opening the PR in order to avoid this in the first place? |
Member
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
7 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This reverts commit ac73335.
This is a revert of #35054, which resulted in at least 7 known regressions, reported here and here, which will hit stable next week.
I think this breakage was somewhat unanticipated, and we did not realize so many crates were broken until this week, so reverting is the conservative thing to do until we figure out how not to cause so much breakage. I've run crater on the revert and did not find any new breakage from the revert.
Fixes #36352
cc @pwoolcoc @rust-lang/libs