Bump bootstrap to 1.98 beta

[Mark-Simulacrum]

View all comments

https://forge.rust-lang.org/release/process.html#default-branch-bootstrap-update-and-crater-tuesday

[rustbot]

miri is developed in its own repository. If possible, consider making this change to rust-lang/miri instead.

cc @rust-lang/miri

stdarch is developed in its own repository. If possible, consider making this change to rust-lang/stdarch instead.

cc @Amanieu, @folkertdev, @sayantn

Some changes occurred in integer formatting

cc @tgross35

[rustbot]

r? @JohnTitor

rustbot has assigned @JohnTitor.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

• Owners of files modified in this PR: libs
• libs expanded to 12 candidates
• Random selection from Darksonn, JohnTitor, clarfonthey, jhpratt

[jieyouxu]

Thanks
r? me @bors r+ rollup=never

View changes since this review

[rust-bors]

📌 Commit 8e98714 has been approved by jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[JonathanBrouwer]

@bors p=6

[rust-bors]

💔 Test for 2d0b8c5 failed: CI. Failed job:

• auto - dist-i686-msvc (web logs, enhanced plaintext logs)

[JonathanBrouwer]

exit code: 0xc0000017, STATUS_NO_MEMORY

Does this reproduce?
@bors try jobs=dist-i686-msvc

[Mark-Simulacrum]

@bors try jobs=dist-i686-msvc

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: b987108 (b9871087ccc20faddfff11243abe66da32861b61)
Base parent: acf6a00 (acf6a00aff5d8aa8892aadff0b48364b50f97cf4)

[Mark-Simulacrum]

@bors try jobs=i686

[rustbot]

This PR was rebased onto a different main commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed.

Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers.

[Mark-Simulacrum]

@bors try jobs=i686

[Mark-Simulacrum]

@bors try jobs=i686

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 8079977 (807997712b96733d92c94e715da474d9128d6dcc)
Base parent: be8e824 (be8e82435eb04fbe75ed5286b52735366e160bed)

[Mark-Simulacrum]

OK, so I think if the Cargo side doesn't materialize quickly we can still land (most) of the bootstrap bump here. The last commit (9532156 as of writing) swaps out the Cargo used by CI on i686 Windows builders so we're not affected by the bug (or the fixes).

I'm not sure that's actually worth it, though, and it would break anyone building locally unless they apply a similar change. My sense is we can evaluate that choice over the next week depending on how the Cargo PR progresses.

[weihanglo]

I guess we need this beta bump first? #159182