Skip to content

Bump bootstrap to 1.96 beta#155335

Merged
rust-bors[bot] merged 2 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
Mark-Simulacrum:bootstrap-bump
Apr 17, 2026
Merged

Bump bootstrap to 1.96 beta#155335
rust-bors[bot] merged 2 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
Mark-Simulacrum:bootstrap-bump

Conversation

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

See https://forge.rust-lang.org/release/process.html#default-branch-bootstrap-update-tuesday

I think this will wind up needing another PR in a week or so when we pick up assert_matches getting destabilized in beta? But that seems like it can be split into its own PR.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-release Relevant to the release subteam, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 15, 2026
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum marked this pull request as ready for review April 16, 2026 01:40
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 16, 2026
@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label Apr 16, 2026
@rustbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 16, 2026

r? @jhpratt

rustbot has assigned @jhpratt.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

  • Owners of files modified in this PR: @scottmcm, libs
  • @scottmcm, libs expanded to 7 candidates
  • Random selection from jhpratt, scottmcm

@jieyouxu jieyouxu self-assigned this Apr 16, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jieyouxu jieyouxu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, 2 more places and a tiny nit, r=me after

@rustbot author

View changes since this review

Comment thread compiler/rustc_feature/src/unstable.rs
Comment thread compiler/rustc_feature/src/unstable.rs
Comment thread compiler/rustc_lint_defs/src/builtin.rs Outdated
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 16, 2026
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Apr 16, 2026
@jieyouxu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks. One thing #155335 (comment), r=me otherwise

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@bors r=jieyouxu

@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Apr 16, 2026

📌 Commit a64c420 has been approved by jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-bors rust-bors bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 16, 2026
rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2026
Rollup of 19 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #141633 (Suggest to bind `self.x` to `x` when field `x` may be in format string)
 - #152980 (c-variadic: fix implementation on `avr`)
 - #154491 (Extend `core::char`'s documentation of casing issues (and fix a rustdoc bug))
 - #155318 (Use mutable pointers for Unix path buffers)
 - #155335 (Bump bootstrap to 1.96 beta)
 - #155354 (Remove AttributeSafety from BUILTIN_ATTRIBUTES)
 - #154970 (rustdoc: preserve `doc(cfg)` on locally re-exported type aliases)
 - #155095 (changed the information provided by (mut x) to mut x (Fix 155030))
 - #155305 (Make `convert_while_ascii` unsafe)
 - #155358 (ImproperCTypes: Move erasing_region_normalisation into helper function)
 - #155377 (tests/debuginfo/basic-stepping.rs: Remove FIXME related to ZSTs)
 - #155383 (Rearrange `rustc_ast_pretty`)
 - #155384 (triagebot: notify on diagnostic attribute changes)
 - #155386 (Use `box_new` diagnostic item for Box::new suggestions)
 - #155391 (Small refactor of `QueryJob::latch` method)
 - #155395 (Tweak how the "copy path" rustdoc button works to allow some accessibility tool to work with rustdoc)
 - #155396 (`as_ref_unchecked` docs link fix)
 - #155411 (compiletest: Remove the `//@ should-ice` directive)
 - #155413 (fix: typo in `std::fs::hard_link` documentation)
@rust-bors rust-bors bot merged commit 6951f83 into rust-lang:main Apr 17, 2026
11 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2026
Rollup merge of #155335 - Mark-Simulacrum:bootstrap-bump, r=jieyouxu

Bump bootstrap to 1.96 beta

See https://forge.rust-lang.org/release/process.html#default-branch-bootstrap-update-tuesday

I think this will wind up needing another PR in a week or so when we pick up assert_matches getting destabilized in beta? But that seems like it can be split into its own PR.
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum deleted the bootstrap-bump branch April 17, 2026 22:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-release Relevant to the release subteam, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants