Skip to content

IN6ADDR_ANY_INIT and IN6ADDR_LOOPBACK_INIT documentation.#104182

Merged
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
gabhijit:ipv6-in6addr-any-doc-fix
Dec 30, 2022
Merged

IN6ADDR_ANY_INIT and IN6ADDR_LOOPBACK_INIT documentation.#104182
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
gabhijit:ipv6-in6addr-any-doc-fix

Conversation

@gabhijit

@gabhijit gabhijit commented Nov 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Added documentation for IPv6 Addresses IN6ADDR_ANY_INIT also known as in6addr_any and IN6ADDR_LOOPBACK_INIT also known as in6addr_loopback similar to INADDR_ANY for IPv4 Addresses.

@gabhijit
IN6ADDR_ANY_INIT and IN6ADDR_LOOPBACK_INIT documentation.
131ba57 
Added documentation for IPv6 Addresses `IN6ADDR_ANY_INIT` also known as
`in6addr_any` and `IN6ADDR_LOOPBACK_INIT` also known as
`in6addr_loopback` similar to `INADDR_ANY` for IPv4 Addresses.
@rustbot

rustbot commented Nov 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

r? @m-ou-se

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 9, 2022
@rustbot

rustbot commented Nov 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@m-ou-se

m-ou-se commented Dec 30, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors

bors commented Dec 30, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 131ba57 has been approved by m-ou-se

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 30, 2022
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr mentioned this pull request Dec 30, 2022
Merged
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2022
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#106296 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-ukdbqwx, r=matth…
bbdca4c 
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 4 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#99244 (doc: clearer and more correct Iterator::scan)
 - rust-lang#103707 (Replace libstd, libcore, liballoc terminology in docs)
 - rust-lang#104182 (`IN6ADDR_ANY_INIT` and `IN6ADDR_LOOPBACK_INIT` documentation.)
 - rust-lang#106273 (rustdoc: remove redundant CSS `.source .content { overflow: visible }`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit bd20fc1 into rust-lang:master Dec 30, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.68.0 milestone Dec 30, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

@m-ou-se m-ou-se

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

1.68.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@gabhijit @rustbot @m-ou-se @bors