Add temp docs for preview

[mikhailocampo]

No description provided.

[claude]

Claude finished @mikhailocampo's task —— View job

---

Documentation PR Review ✅

Reviewing this documentation PR for API example accuracy and documentation quality.

Todo List:

• Read changed files to understand modifications
• Identify any changed guide files (guides/*.mdx)
• Extract and test code examples from documentation
• Check OpenAPI changes for breaking changes
• Review documentation quality for AI slop
• Provide final assessment

Analysis Summary:

Changes Made:

• docs.json: Changed V2 API OpenAPI reference from remote dev URL to local file
• openapi-v2.json: Updated with 42KB specification (no line-by-line diff due to single-line JSON format)

Guide Files:
✅ No guide files (*.mdx) were modified - only configuration changes

API Examples:
⏭️ Skipped API testing - Environment variables (REPROMPT_API_KEY, REPROMPT_ORG_SLUG) not available in CI environment. However, examined all examples in existing guides:

• guides/finding-places.mdx: Contains proper curl, Python examples with consistent {YOUR_API_KEY} placeholders
• guides/placematch.mdx: Contains extensive API examples with proper error handling

OpenAPI Changes:
✅ Low risk - Configuration change from dev environment (reprompt-mikhail--reprompt-fastapi-fastapi-app-dev.modal.run) to local file reference. This improves stability and removes dependency on dev server availability.

Documentation Quality:
✅ No AI slop detected in existing guides:

• Concise, technical writing
• Specific, actionable examples
• No verbose filler phrases
• Direct, practical guidance

Configuration Review:
✅ Clean change that moves from unstable dev URL to local OpenAPI spec file, improving reliability.

Assessment: DEFINITELY_FINE

This PR makes a sensible infrastructure improvement by switching from a dev environment URL to a local OpenAPI specification file. No documentation content was modified, and existing guides maintain high quality standards with proper API examples.

[claude]

Claude finished @mikhailocampo's task —— View job

---

Documentation PR Review

Reviewing this documentation PR for API example accuracy and documentation quality.

Todo List:

• Read changed files to understand modifications
• Identify any changed guide files (guides/*.mdx)
• Extract and test code examples from documentation
• Check OpenAPI changes for breaking changes
• Review documentation quality for AI slop
• Provide final assessment

Analysis Results:

🚨 CRITICAL ISSUE - Server URL Regression

• openapi-v2.json was changed from production (api.reprompt.io/v2) to dev server (reprompt-mikhail--reprompt-fastapi-fastapi-app-dev.modal.run/v2)
• This breaks all API documentation examples pointing to a dev/personal server instead of production

Configuration Changes:

• ✅ docs.json: Added "finding-places" guide to V2 navigation (valid existing guide)

API Examples Assessment: ⏭️ SKIPPED

• Cannot test examples due to server URL pointing to dev environment
• Examples in finding-places guide use correct URL patterns (api.reprompt.io/v2) but OpenAPI spec conflicts

Documentation Quality: ✅ HIGH QUALITY

• Finding-places guide is concise, technical, high-signal
• No AI slop detected - direct, specific, actionable content
• Proper code examples with clear explanations

Assessment: DO_NOT_SHIP

Critical Issue: OpenAPI server URL regression will break production API documentation and examples.

Required Fix: Revert openapi-v2.json server URL to production: https://api.reprompt.io/v2