fix: include website pack in MCP surface#117
Merged
Merged
Conversation
admin-raintree
approved these changes
Jul 17, 2026
admin-raintree
left a comment
admin-raintree
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Release-gate fix reviewed: the tool is already registered and this restores the declared MCP surface parity.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The v6.4.0 publish gate found that the registered
website_packtool was missing fromPUBLIC_MCP_TOOLS, causing the full MCP release smoke to fail. This adds the registered tool to the canonical surface contract.\n\nVerification:uv run --locked --extra dev pytest tests/test_surface_contract.py -q(12 passed).