gh-113009: Fix multiprocessing Process.terminate() on Windows#113128
Merged
vstinner merged 1 commit intopython:mainfrom Dec 15, 2023
Merged
gh-113009: Fix multiprocessing Process.terminate() on Windows#113128vstinner merged 1 commit intopython:mainfrom
vstinner merged 1 commit intopython:mainfrom
Conversation
Member
Author
|
TerminateProcess() is kind-of asynchronous:
|
On Windows, Process.terminate() no longer sets the returncode attribute to always call WaitForSingleObject() in Process.wait(). Previously, sometimes the process was still running after TerminateProcess() even if GetExitCodeProcess() is not STILL_ACTIVE.
vstinner
force-pushed
the
mp_popen_win32_terminate
branch
from
55f24b1 to
cab0864
Compare
vstinner
added
needs backport to 3.11
serhiy-storchaka
approved these changes
Dec 15, 2023
|
Thanks @vstinner for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11, 3.12. |
|
GH-113177 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.12 branch. |
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2023
…ythonGH-113128) On Windows, Process.terminate() no longer sets the returncode attribute to always call WaitForSingleObject() in Process.wait(). Previously, sometimes the process was still running after TerminateProcess() even if GetExitCodeProcess() is not STILL_ACTIVE. (cherry picked from commit 4026ad5) Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <vstinner@python.org>
|
GH-113178 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch. |
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2023
…ythonGH-113128) On Windows, Process.terminate() no longer sets the returncode attribute to always call WaitForSingleObject() in Process.wait(). Previously, sometimes the process was still running after TerminateProcess() even if GetExitCodeProcess() is not STILL_ACTIVE. (cherry picked from commit 4026ad5) Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <vstinner@python.org>
Member
Author
|
Merged, thanks for the review Serhiy 👍 |
vstinner
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2023
…H-113128) (#113178) gh-113009: Fix multiprocessing Process.terminate() on Windows (GH-113128) On Windows, Process.terminate() no longer sets the returncode attribute to always call WaitForSingleObject() in Process.wait(). Previously, sometimes the process was still running after TerminateProcess() even if GetExitCodeProcess() is not STILL_ACTIVE. (cherry picked from commit 4026ad5) Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <vstinner@python.org>
vstinner
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2023
…H-113128) (#113177) gh-113009: Fix multiprocessing Process.terminate() on Windows (GH-113128) On Windows, Process.terminate() no longer sets the returncode attribute to always call WaitForSingleObject() in Process.wait(). Previously, sometimes the process was still running after TerminateProcess() even if GetExitCodeProcess() is not STILL_ACTIVE. (cherry picked from commit 4026ad5) Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <vstinner@python.org>
corona10
pushed a commit
to corona10/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2023
…ython#113128) On Windows, Process.terminate() no longer sets the returncode attribute to always call WaitForSingleObject() in Process.wait(). Previously, sometimes the process was still running after TerminateProcess() even if GetExitCodeProcess() is not STILL_ACTIVE.
aisk
pushed a commit
to aisk/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2024
…ython#113128) On Windows, Process.terminate() no longer sets the returncode attribute to always call WaitForSingleObject() in Process.wait(). Previously, sometimes the process was still running after TerminateProcess() even if GetExitCodeProcess() is not STILL_ACTIVE.
Glyphack
pushed a commit
to Glyphack/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 2, 2024
…ython#113128) On Windows, Process.terminate() no longer sets the returncode attribute to always call WaitForSingleObject() in Process.wait(). Previously, sometimes the process was still running after TerminateProcess() even if GetExitCodeProcess() is not STILL_ACTIVE.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
On Windows, Process.terminate() no longer sets the returncode attribute to always call WaitForSingleObject() in Process.wait(). Previously, sometimes the process was still running after TerminateProcess() even if GetExitCodeProcess() is not STILL_ACTIVE.
TemporaryDirectory.__exit__sometimes raises bad PermissionError #113009