Implicit Tag Recorded without UI

[hallahan]

It would make sense to always add the tag

<tag k="source" v="OpenMapKit"/>

[dalekunce]

yeah great idea.

[vdeparday]

Could we also add project name and add it automatically as a tag to the
changeset comment and in the source tag? Not sure where it would be
inputed? I suppose by the admin who is setting up the form?

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Dale Kunce notifications@github.com
wrote:

yeah great idea.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#57 (comment)
.

[dalekunce]

Keeping with our hashtag model for tracking edits it would be cool to pre-populate them via xlsform if we are able to submit directly from the phone.

[hallahan]

What was the verdict with this one? Are we going to do this in the source tag. The answer was no with created_by.

[hallahan]

I think rather than hitting the source=OpenMapKit issue head on, we instead want to have a constraint

Implicit Tag Recorded without UI

That way, you could specify in your XLS Form the a specific key / value, such as k="source" v="OpenMapKit", or whatever. This leaves things open to unforeseen use cases.

[hallahan]

A good example of an implicit tag would be source=survey. We'd want this to be added pretty much always, based on our current workflow.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source

Can you think of any other tags that might be implicit?

cc/ @dalekunce @PaulUithol

[hallahan]

For a specific survey, implicit addr:city and addr:state might make sense.

[PaulUithol]

In our case, we had separate forms for each amenity we were surveying. So
amenity=bank, amenity=atm etc would've been implicit. Some addr tags
are a good one as well indeed.
On May 11, 2016 9:15 PM, "Nicholas Hallahan" notifications@github.com
wrote:

For a specific survey, implicit addr:city and addr:state might make sense.

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#57 (comment)

[hallahan]

Done.