Skip to content

Adding first draft of PIP-0001 Anti Gaming#2

Open
anders462 wants to merge 12 commits into
pollen-mobile:mainfrom
anders462:main
Open

Adding first draft of PIP-0001 Anti Gaming#2
anders462 wants to merge 12 commits into
pollen-mobile:mainfrom
anders462:main

Conversation

@anders462

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Adding first draft of PIP-0001 Anti Gaming to start discussion and documentation

Comment thread 0001-pip-anti-gaming.md Outdated

#### What could further be done.
1. Reduce max Hex for a Camellia as its the most commonly gamed.
* Motivation: Its an indoor flower, a hex is several city block, and its therefore not possible for a Camellia to cover more then 1 hex.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If a Camelia was at a crosssection of 3 hexes it could easily touch each hex.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah totally true, good point.

Comment thread 0001-pip-anti-gaming.md Outdated
1. If a flower changes GPS location the flower wouldnt get any rewards for that day.
* Motivation: Moving a flower would have a fee (similar to Helium) but the fee would be a loss of rewards not something flower owner have to pay.
* Side effects: Possible GPS drift could cause rewards loss. Could be mitagted in post process of data.
2. Require uptime for flowers. This has already been discussed due this exploit but also from network availabilty point of view. Doesnt really solve the issue as USP could be used

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Uptime doesn't have to be 0 or 1, it could be if uptime is 80% then they get 80% of rewards.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't agree about % rewards this is a telecom data network, but I think we need to agree on what the threshold is. We should require certain availability X% to be reached. This will encourage network owners to install UPS, reliable internet connections etc

Comment thread 0001-pip-anti-gaming.md Outdated
#### What could further be done.
1. If a flower changes GPS location the flower wouldnt get any rewards for that day.
* Motivation: Moving a flower would have a fee (similar to Helium) but the fee would be a loss of rewards not something flower owner have to pay.
* Side effects: Possible GPS drift could cause rewards loss. Could be mitagted in post process of data.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be dug into and tested before implementation. Some of the best implementations of hotspots are also going to be high up so we really need to make sure we're not dinging those.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes for sure need to be tested.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants