Relax LGTM requirement

[caniszczyk]

There has been a request to relax the number of LGTMs in the tools projects to help improve merge rate.

Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk caniszczyk@gmail.com

[wking]

Should this also come with a MAINTAINERS prune? I'm surprised that a project with 11 active maintainers would have difficulty collecting two LGTMs, so if we are having trouble with that, then all 11 maintainers are probably not active.

[wking]

And if we go with one LGTM, you'll also want to update the maintainer's guide.

[liangchenye]

@caniszczyk Hi, can you update the 'MAINTAINERS_GUIDE.md' ?

[liangchenye]

LGTM
I think we can merge it first, I'll update the maintainer's guide later.

[zhouhao3]

LGTM

[wking]

Should this also come with a MAINTAINERS prune?

I haven't noticed difficulty collecting two LGTMs, but there are certainly a few nominal maintainers that LGTM pulls very rarely. On the other hand, free-riding non-spec maintainers aren't much of a functional issue.

[liangchenye]

I think the change is about: the strategy of the tool project could be 'more agile and mistake tolerable' .