Conversation
Please review this post. ❤️,@nodejs/evangelism
|
The releases section may already be outdated. 4.2.0 may still drop this week. See: nodejs/node#3258 |
|
Also I'm wondering if the releases sections are good ideas here? We already do release blog posts. |
|
@Fishrock123 Thanks for your comment 😄
@nodejs/evangelism What are your ideas? 😄 |
|
Some people see the weekly updates that don't see the release posts so we should at least mention that a release happened, and maybe just link to that release post, in each weekly update, but we probably don't need to go in to the detail that we were previously. |
|
@Fishrock123 It seems that 4.2.0 is aiming for Monday release. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nit: Should be two sentences. (The comma should be a period.)
|
I agree that there should be less detail about the release. Just mention the release, make sure there's a link for people to get more information, and maybe mention the most important one or two things about it. Otherwise, "fixes several bugs" is a pretty good filler text for patch releases. |
|
The news about Red Hat should have a link to the press release or something with more information. Here's one you can use: https://www.redhat.com/en/about/press-releases/red-hat-joins-nodejs-foundation |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nit: Instead of StrongLoop introduces Arrow functions (which makes it sound like they have a Node.js feature no one else has), go with something like StrongLoop provides "An Introduction to JavaScript ES6 Arrow Functions"
|
@Trott I've updated based on your comments. |
|
I wonder why CI isn't happy |
|
@JungMinu Travis is drunk. Don't worry. |
|
@fhemberger Thanks :) |
|
LGTM, can we merge it? |
|
I'd love to 👍 |
|
Bam! 💥 😄 |
Please review this post. ❤️,@nodejs/evangelism