test: use mustCall() for simple flow tracking#7753
Conversation
|
R= @nodejs/testing |
|
LGTM Really happy to see these improvements, looks much cleaner than what we had. |
|
LGTM |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Shouldn't there be a common.mustCall here?
|
LGTM with some nits. Maybe you can mention in the commit log that you also replace a few 'unexpected call' handlers with common.fail. Otherwise a nice cleanup. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can't this be a problem if data is emitted multiple times?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes. It was in the CI run actually. I'm going to fix it up when I push some changes.
|
New CI with fixes came back green: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/3328/ |
Many of the tests use variables to track when callback functions are invoked or events are emitted. These variables are then asserted on process exit. This commit replaces this pattern in straightforward cases with common.mustCall(). This makes the tests easier to reason about, leads to a net reduction in lines of code, and uncovered a few bugs in tests. This commit also replaces some callbacks that should never be called with common.fail(). Reviewed-By: Wyatt Preul <wpreul@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <jmwsoft@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
|
Had to force push to include the |
Many of the tests use variables to track when callback functions are invoked or events are emitted. These variables are then asserted on process exit. This commit replaces this pattern in straightforward cases with common.mustCall(). This makes the tests easier to reason about, leads to a net reduction in lines of code, and uncovered a few bugs in tests. This commit also replaces some callbacks that should never be called with common.fail(). PR-URL: #7753 Reviewed-By: Wyatt Preul <wpreul@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <jmwsoft@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
|
@cjihrig any chance you would be interested in sending a backport PR to v6.x? This isn't landing cleanly. Thanks! |
|
@evanlucas yep, will do. |
Many of the tests use variables to track when callback functions are invoked or events are emitted. These variables are then asserted on process exit. This commit replaces this pattern in straightforward cases with common.mustCall(). This makes the tests easier to reason about, leads to a net reduction in lines of code, and uncovered a few bugs in tests. This commit also replaces some callbacks that should never be called with common.fail(). PR-URL: nodejs#7753 Reviewed-By: Wyatt Preul <wpreul@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <jmwsoft@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Conflicts: test/parallel/test-file-read-noexist.js
Many of the tests use variables to track when callback functions are invoked or events are emitted. These variables are then asserted on process exit. This commit replaces this pattern in straightforward cases with common.mustCall(). This makes the tests easier to reason about, leads to a net reduction in lines of code, and uncovered a few bugs in tests. This commit also replaces some callbacks that should never be called with common.fail(). PR-URL: #7753 Reviewed-By: Wyatt Preul <wpreul@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <jmwsoft@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Conflicts: test/parallel/test-file-read-noexist.js
|
@cjihrig this is definitely not landing cleanly on v4.x. Adding the don't land label, please feel free to backport if you like |
Many of the tests use variables to track when callback functions are invoked or events are emitted. These variables are then asserted on process exit. This commit replaces this pattern in straightforward cases with common.mustCall(). This makes the tests easier to reason about, leads to a net reduction in lines of code, and uncovered a few bugs in tests. This commit also replaces some callbacks that should never be called with common.fail(). PR-URL: nodejs#7753 Reviewed-By: Wyatt Preul <wpreul@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <jmwsoft@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Many of the tests use variables to track when callback functions are invoked or events are emitted. These variables are then asserted on process exit. This commit replaces this pattern in straightforward cases with common.mustCall(). This makes the tests easier to reason about, leads to a net reduction in lines of code, and uncovered a few bugs in tests. This commit also replaces some callbacks that should never be called with common.fail(). PR-URL: #7753 Reviewed-By: Wyatt Preul <wpreul@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <jmwsoft@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Many of the tests use variables to track when callback functions are invoked or events are emitted. These variables are then asserted on process exit. This commit replaces this pattern in straightforward cases with common.mustCall(). This makes the tests easier to reason about, leads to a net reduction in lines of code, and uncovered a few bugs in tests. This commit also replaces some callbacks that should never be called with common.fail(). PR-URL: #7753 Reviewed-By: Wyatt Preul <wpreul@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <jmwsoft@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Many of the tests use variables to track when callback functions are invoked or events are emitted. These variables are then asserted on process exit. This commit replaces this pattern in straightforward cases with common.mustCall(). This makes the tests easier to reason about, leads to a net reduction in lines of code, and uncovered a few bugs in tests. This commit also replaces some callbacks that should never be called with common.fail(). PR-URL: #7753 Reviewed-By: Wyatt Preul <wpreul@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <jmwsoft@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Many of the tests use variables to track when callback functions are invoked or events are emitted. These variables are then asserted on process exit. This commit replaces this pattern in straightforward cases with common.mustCall(). This makes the tests easier to reason about, leads to a net reduction in lines of code, and uncovered a few bugs in tests. This commit also replaces some callbacks that should never be called with common.fail(). PR-URL: #7753 Reviewed-By: Wyatt Preul <wpreul@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <jmwsoft@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test nosign(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
test
Description of change
Many of the tests use variables to track when callback functions are invoked or events are emitted. These variables are then asserted on process exit. This commit replaces this pattern in straightforward cases with
common.mustCall(). This makes the tests easier to reason about, leads to a net reduction in lines of code, and uncovered a few bugs in tests.