doc: added note warning about change to console.endTime()#6454
Closed
ben-page wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom
Closed
doc: added note warning about change to console.endTime()#6454ben-page wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom
ben-page wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom
Conversation
doc/api/console.md
Outdated
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you use Node.js v6.0.0 here please?
Maybe also instead of "timeEnd()", do console.timeEnd()
Contributor
|
Thanks for the PR @ben-page! I made a few comments. Let me know if you have any questions. /cc @nodejs/documentation |
Member
|
LGTM with nits addressed |
Contributor
|
LGTM with @evanlucas nits addressed. Thx. |
Unintended functionality was removed from console.endTime by nodejs#3562. Prior to that, you could call console.endTime multiple times for the same label.
ben-page
force-pushed
the
doc-console-endTime
branch
from
b05db6f to
dad5c2c
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks for the feedback. I made the changes. |
Contributor
|
LGTM |
1 similar comment
Contributor
|
LGTM |
jasnell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2016
Unintended functionality was removed from console.endTime by #3562. Prior to that, you could call console.endTime multiple times for the same label. PR-URL: #6454 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Robert Lindstaedt <robert.lindstaedt@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jeremy Whitlock <jwhitlock@apache.org>
Member
|
Landed in 541965f |
Fishrock123
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 4, 2016
Unintended functionality was removed from console.endTime by #3562. Prior to that, you could call console.endTime multiple times for the same label. PR-URL: #6454 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Robert Lindstaedt <robert.lindstaedt@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jeremy Whitlock <jwhitlock@apache.org>
This was referenced May 4, 2016
joelostrowski
pushed a commit
to joelostrowski/node
that referenced
this pull request
May 4, 2016
Unintended functionality was removed from console.endTime by nodejs#3562. Prior to that, you could call console.endTime multiple times for the same label. PR-URL: nodejs#6454 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Robert Lindstaedt <robert.lindstaedt@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jeremy Whitlock <jwhitlock@apache.org>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
9 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist
Affected core subsystem(s)
doc
Description of change
I added a note warning about a change to console.endTime(). Prior to #3562, you could call console.endTime multiple times for the same label. This was unintended functionality, but the change needed to be documented.
Related Issue: #6452