sqlite,src: refactor sqlite value conversion#57571
Merged
nodejs-github-bot merged 3 commits intonodejs:mainfrom Apr 3, 2025
Merged
sqlite,src: refactor sqlite value conversion#57571nodejs-github-bot merged 3 commits intonodejs:mainfrom
nodejs-github-bot merged 3 commits intonodejs:mainfrom
Conversation
Collaborator
|
Review requested:
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #57571 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.23% 90.23% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 629 630 +1
Lines 184903 185009 +106
Branches 36223 36221 -2
==========================================
+ Hits 166853 166944 +91
- Misses 11010 11038 +28
+ Partials 7040 7027 -13
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Collaborator
jasnell
approved these changes
Mar 21, 2025
Member
|
Is this "returning function body macro" paradigm used elsewhere? Appreciate the rationale, but it seems like it lends potential for future mishaps? |
Contributor
Author
For this, specifically, I don't think so. This type conversion is unlikely to change. We need to find a way to isolate this anyways since it's being required more and more. |
cjihrig
reviewed
Mar 22, 2025
6cf644e to
2611aa7
Compare
jasnell
approved these changes
Mar 25, 2025
cjihrig
approved these changes
Mar 26, 2025
Contributor
cjihrig
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM with one minor comment.
Contributor
Failed to start CI⚠ Commits were pushed since the last approving review: ⚠ - sqlite,src: refactor sqlite value conversion ⚠ - fixup: apply review suggestions ⚠ - sqlite,src: improve conversion macro ✘ Refusing to run CI on potentially unsafe PRhttps://github.com/nodejs/node/actions/runs/14196415493 |
aduh95
approved these changes
Apr 2, 2025
Collaborator
Collaborator
Collaborator
|
Landed in 8360ce2 |
JonasBa
pushed a commit
to JonasBa/node
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2025
PR-URL: nodejs#57571 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
RafaelGSS
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 1, 2025
PR-URL: #57571 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
RafaelGSS
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2025
PR-URL: #57571 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
aduh95
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 6, 2025
PR-URL: #57571 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
aduh95
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 6, 2025
PR-URL: #57571 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
RafaelGSS
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2025
PR-URL: #57571 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
aduh95
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2025
PR-URL: #57571 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
aduh95
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2025
PR-URL: #57571 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
aduh95
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2025
PR-URL: #57571 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
aduh95
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2025
PR-URL: #57571 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
aduh95
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 18, 2025
PR-URL: #57571 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
aduh95
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2025
PR-URL: #57571 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is a minor refactor on converting SQLite values to JS. It makes the work for #56600 easier and reduces duplication.