test: cover publicExponent validation in OpenSSL#46632
Merged
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit intonodejs:mainfrom Feb 18, 2023
Merged
test: cover publicExponent validation in OpenSSL#46632nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit intonodejs:mainfrom
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit intonodejs:mainfrom
Conversation
Add a test case for public exponents that are invalid according to some internal OpenSSL validation logic, but which are accepted by node's own validation logic.
panva
approved these changes
Feb 13, 2023
cjihrig
approved these changes
Feb 13, 2023
aymen94
approved these changes
Feb 14, 2023
lpinca
approved these changes
Feb 14, 2023
antsmartian
approved these changes
Feb 16, 2023
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Collaborator
32 tasks
Collaborator
|
Landed in f1a30b9 |
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2023
Add a test case for public exponents that are invalid according to some internal OpenSSL validation logic, but which are accepted by node's own validation logic. PR-URL: #46632 Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <panva.ip@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
Merged
21 tasks
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2023
Add a test case for public exponents that are invalid according to some internal OpenSSL validation logic, but which are accepted by node's own validation logic. PR-URL: #46632 Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <panva.ip@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
danielleadams
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2023
Add a test case for public exponents that are invalid according to some internal OpenSSL validation logic, but which are accepted by node's own validation logic. PR-URL: #46632 Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <panva.ip@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add a test case for public exponents that are invalid according to some internal OpenSSL validation logic, but which are accepted by node's own validation logic.