doc: http2.createServer options as optional#42832
Merged
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom Apr 28, 2022
Merged
doc: http2.createServer options as optional#42832nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom
options as optional#42832nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom
Conversation
The method might be designed to explicitly take `options`. However, the implementation and many examples already allow the first parameter of a function type.
Collaborator
|
Review requested:
|
ronag
approved these changes
Apr 23, 2022
Mesteery
approved these changes
Apr 23, 2022
RafaelGSS
approved these changes
Apr 23, 2022
lpinca
approved these changes
Apr 23, 2022
RaisinTen
approved these changes
Apr 24, 2022
Collaborator
|
Landed in 489e229 |
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2022
The method might be designed to explicitly take `options`. However, the implementation and many examples already allow the first parameter of a function type. PR-URL: #42832 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Robert Nagy <ronagy@icloud.com> Reviewed-By: Paolo Insogna <paolo@cowtech.it> Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
juanarbol
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 31, 2022
The method might be designed to explicitly take `options`. However, the implementation and many examples already allow the first parameter of a function type. PR-URL: #42832 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Robert Nagy <ronagy@icloud.com> Reviewed-By: Paolo Insogna <paolo@cowtech.it> Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
danielleadams
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 27, 2022
The method might be designed to explicitly take `options`. However, the implementation and many examples already allow the first parameter of a function type. PR-URL: #42832 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Robert Nagy <ronagy@icloud.com> Reviewed-By: Paolo Insogna <paolo@cowtech.it> Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2022
The method might be designed to explicitly take `options`. However, the implementation and many examples already allow the first parameter of a function type. PR-URL: #42832 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Robert Nagy <ronagy@icloud.com> Reviewed-By: Paolo Insogna <paolo@cowtech.it> Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2022
The method might be designed to explicitly take `options`. However, the implementation and many examples already allow the first parameter of a function type. PR-URL: #42832 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Robert Nagy <ronagy@icloud.com> Reviewed-By: Paolo Insogna <paolo@cowtech.it> Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
guangwong
pushed a commit
to noslate-project/node
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2022
The method might be designed to explicitly take `options`. However, the implementation and many examples already allow the first parameter of a function type. PR-URL: nodejs/node#42832 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Robert Nagy <ronagy@icloud.com> Reviewed-By: Paolo Insogna <paolo@cowtech.it> Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The method might be designed to explicitly take
options. However,the implementation and many examples already allow the first parameter
of function type. (This is maybe because of Compatibility API.)
node/lib/internal/http2/core.js
Lines 3316 to 3321 in eeb27c2
I'm not sure whether applying the same to http2.createSecureServer is
meaningful. But, seeing https.createServer, the
optionsparameter ishandled as optional.