doc: remove statement about (EC)DHE performance#41528
Closed
tniessen wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom
Closed
doc: remove statement about (EC)DHE performance#41528tniessen wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom
tniessen wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom
Conversation
Member
tniessen
commented
Jan 14, 2022
- This statement is misleading in that it says "key generation is expensive". ECDHE key generation (over the elliptic curves that are commonly used for TLS) is insanely fast compared to most other types of key generation.
- This statement is irrelevant for TLS 1.3, which requires (EC)DHE.
- Even if this statement is somewhat true for TLS 1.2, it does not justify discouraging the use of (EC)DHE.
Member
Author
|
cc @nodejs/crypto |
Trott
approved these changes
Jan 15, 2022
addaleax
approved these changes
Jan 15, 2022
benjamingr
approved these changes
Jan 15, 2022
Member
benjamingr
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All these changes are really good 🙇
tniessen
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 16, 2022
This statement is misleading in that it says "key generation is expensive". ECDHE key generation (over the elliptic curves that are commonly used for TLS) is insanely fast compared to most other types of key generation. This statement is irrelevant for TLS 1.3, which requires (EC)DHE. Even if this statement is somewhat true for TLS 1.2, it does not justify discouraging the use of (EC)DHE. PR-URL: #41528 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Member
Author
|
Landed in 986cf3b. Thanks @benjamingr and thanks all for reviewing! |
mawaregetsuka
pushed a commit
to mawaregetsuka/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 17, 2022
This statement is misleading in that it says "key generation is expensive". ECDHE key generation (over the elliptic curves that are commonly used for TLS) is insanely fast compared to most other types of key generation. This statement is irrelevant for TLS 1.3, which requires (EC)DHE. Even if this statement is somewhat true for TLS 1.2, it does not justify discouraging the use of (EC)DHE. PR-URL: nodejs#41528 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
thedull
pushed a commit
to thedull/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 18, 2022
This statement is misleading in that it says "key generation is expensive". ECDHE key generation (over the elliptic curves that are commonly used for TLS) is insanely fast compared to most other types of key generation. This statement is irrelevant for TLS 1.3, which requires (EC)DHE. Even if this statement is somewhat true for TLS 1.2, it does not justify discouraging the use of (EC)DHE. PR-URL: nodejs#41528 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
BethGriggs
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 25, 2022
This statement is misleading in that it says "key generation is expensive". ECDHE key generation (over the elliptic curves that are commonly used for TLS) is insanely fast compared to most other types of key generation. This statement is irrelevant for TLS 1.3, which requires (EC)DHE. Even if this statement is somewhat true for TLS 1.2, it does not justify discouraging the use of (EC)DHE. PR-URL: #41528 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Linkgoron
pushed a commit
to Linkgoron/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2022
This statement is misleading in that it says "key generation is expensive". ECDHE key generation (over the elliptic curves that are commonly used for TLS) is insanely fast compared to most other types of key generation. This statement is irrelevant for TLS 1.3, which requires (EC)DHE. Even if this statement is somewhat true for TLS 1.2, it does not justify discouraging the use of (EC)DHE. PR-URL: nodejs#41528 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
danielleadams
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 26, 2022
This statement is misleading in that it says "key generation is expensive". ECDHE key generation (over the elliptic curves that are commonly used for TLS) is insanely fast compared to most other types of key generation. This statement is irrelevant for TLS 1.3, which requires (EC)DHE. Even if this statement is somewhat true for TLS 1.2, it does not justify discouraging the use of (EC)DHE. PR-URL: #41528 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.