meta: update module pages in CODEOWNERS#34932
Conversation
|
Review requested:
|
nodejs-github-bot
added
the
meta
This will be blocked until that lands as the linting for CODEOWNERS will fail for non-existent paths. |
This is a good idea once we have all files listed (we're still very far today) |
|
@richardlau #34748 has landed, is there something I can do to unblock this PR? |
Rebase so that it’s picked up — that should get the lint-codeowners check to pass. |
|
Landed in 622ea75 |
PR-URL: #34932 Reviewed-By: Mary Marchini <oss@mmarchini.me> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Derek Lewis <DerekNonGeneric@inf.is> Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
|
#34875 is not getting much love because @nodejs-github-bot didn't know who to tag. Can someone ping @nodejs/modules over there please? |
|
This depends on #34748 (otherwise the CODEOWNER linting breaks) and that has the |
PR-URL: #34932 Reviewed-By: Mary Marchini <oss@mmarchini.me> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Derek Lewis <DerekNonGeneric@inf.is> Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #34932 Reviewed-By: Mary Marchini <oss@mmarchini.me> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Derek Lewis <DerekNonGeneric@inf.is> Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
7 participants
I figured that should explain why the bot didn't tag @nodejs/modules in #34875.
Maybe we could add a test to check if every file is listed to the CODEOWNERS to avoid it happening again?
I've also added
/doc/api/packages.md, which will be introduced by #34748, it's probably a good idea to wait for it to land first before landing this PR.Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes