[v10.x backport] src: initial large page (2M) support

[uttampawar]

PR-URL: #22079
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil gpunathi@in.ibm.com
Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko shishugi@gmail.com
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann refack@gmail.com

Checklist

• make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
• commit message follows commit guidelines

[uttampawar]

@addaleax Created this backport PR for new Large Pages Support in v10.x release. I followed all the instructions as stated in backporting-to-release-lines.md document. One step I couldn't do is to run node-test-pull-request CI job due to permission issue. Is this step different than default Travis CI job starts with any new PR changes? Any help is appreciated.

[refack]

Thank you @uttampawar, here's a CI job: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/18131/

[refack]

Changes to build scaffolding LGTM
RSLGTM on actual implementation.

[refack]

There was a failed test with the workers test-suite, but it might be in the onderlining branch. is in the underlining branch. PR to fix is pending #23876

Details

AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: Binding contextify,Internal Binding worker,NativeModule events,NativeModule internal/async_hooks,NativeModule internal/errors,Binding uv,Binding buffer,Binding async_wrap,Internal Binding async_wrap,Binding config,Binding icu,NativeModule util,NativeModule internal/util/inspect,Binding util,NativeModule internal/util,Binding constants,Internal Binding types,NativeModule internal/util/types,NativeModule internal/validators,NativeModule internal/encoding,Internal Binding icu,NativeModule buffer,NativeModule internal/buffer,NativeModule internal/process/per_thread,NativeModule internal/process/worker_thread_only,NativeModule internal/process/stdio,NativeModule internal/worker,NativeModule assert,NativeModule internal/assert,NativeModule fs,NativeModule path,NativeModule internal/constants,Binding fs,NativeModule internal/fs/streams,NativeModule internal/fs/utils,NativeModule stream,NativeModule internal/streams/pipeline,NativeModule internal/streams/end-of-stream,NativeModule internal/streams/legacy,NativeModule _stream_readable,NativeModule internal/streams/buffer_list,NativeModule internal/streams/destroy,NativeModule internal/streams/state,NativeModule _stream_writable,NativeModule _stream_duplex,NativeModule _stream_transform,NativeModule _stream_passthrough,NativeModule internal/url,NativeModule internal/querystring,Binding url,Internal Binding messaging,Internal Binding symbols,NativeModule internal/error-serdes,NativeModule v8,Binding serdes,Binding v8,NativeModule internal/safe_globals,NativeModule url,NativeModule internal/process/warning,NativeModule internal/process/next_tick,NativeModule internal/process/promises,Internal Binding util,NativeModule internal/fixed_queue,Binding performance,Binding trace_events,NativeModule internal/inspector_async_hook,Binding inspector,Internal Binding options,NativeModule timers,Binding timer_wrap,NativeModule internal/linkedlist,NativeModule internal/timers,NativeModule internal/modules/cjs/loader,NativeModule vm,NativeModule internal/modules/cjs/helpers,NativeModule console,NativeModule internal/domexception,NativeModule worker_threads,NativeModule module
    at Object.<anonymous> (/home/iojs/build/workspace/node-test-commit-custom-suites-freestyle/test/parallel/test-bootstrap-modules.js:14:1)

[uttampawar]

@refack Do I need to do anything for this PR?

[refack]

@uttampawar the issue behind #23876 was resolved so I'll try to rebase and run a new CI test.

[refack]

Resume CI:https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/18237/

[refack]

@targos PTAL for 10.x

[lundibundi]

LGTM with a question.

[lundibundi]

Is this change intentional? If so why is it not in a separate commit (backporting this 2d4dd10)?

[uttampawar]

@lundibundi It was not intentional. I'll fix this and update the PR.

[uttampawar]

@lundibundi Fixed the accidental deletion of blank line.

[MylesBorins]

landed in d1102f8