[8.x] v8 bug fixes for s390x#22375
Conversation
|
issue: #22364 |
|
Could anyone please advice where should the small test described in the issue should go into? |
|
I'm not sure the V8 version should be bumped, but definitely the v8_embedder_string in common.gypi needs to be bumped. |
|
commit links to ca95cd9 but the correct hash is 9040405eb952124d24b37c501f8eb4456fc318da |
Bumping the V8 version is correct for 8.x ( |
Perhaps contribute the failing testcase to the V8 tests? |
Original commit message: s390x: fix high 32-bit word corruption issue [email protected] Change-Id: I9a2cf0f3e4a33dc4b86c83acfefcd27968bbcdb4 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1176424 Reviewed-by: Joran Siu <[email protected]> Commit-Queue: Junliang Yan <[email protected]> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{nodejs#55143} Refs: v8/v8@ca95cd9
|
Thanks @devsnek for pointing out. The message is updated. |
mhdawson
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, looked at past history and cherrypicks like this did bunch the patch level
|
@BethGriggs any chance to can review and then land if there are no objections before then? |
|
The CI started by @MylesBorins was green :) |
|
@MylesBorins, how long does this PR need before it can be merged into v8.x-staging? Could it make the v8.12.0 release on September 4th? |
Original commit message: s390x: fix high 32-bit word corruption issue [email protected] Change-Id: I9a2cf0f3e4a33dc4b86c83acfefcd27968bbcdb4 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1176424 Reviewed-by: Joran Siu <[email protected]> Commit-Queue: Junliang Yan <[email protected]> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55143} Refs: v8/v8@ca95cd9 PR-URL: #22375 Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Beth Griggs <[email protected]>
|
Landed in 5294919 |
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes