test: remove hidden use of common.PORT in parallel tests#17466
Closed
Trott wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom
Closed
test: remove hidden use of common.PORT in parallel tests#17466Trott wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom
Trott wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom
Conversation
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the test using common.PORT gets it. Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost().
Member
Author
|
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/11882/ (UPDATE: CI is good.) |
lpinca
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2017
cjihrig
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2017
jasnell
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2017
BridgeAR
approved these changes
Dec 6, 2017
Member
|
This does not require 48 hours as far as I see it |
Member
Author
|
Landed in abd5d95. |
Trott
added a commit
to Trott/io.js
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2017
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the test using common.PORT gets it. Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost(). PR-URL: nodejs#17466 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2017
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the test using common.PORT gets it. Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost(). PR-URL: #17466 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2017
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the test using common.PORT gets it. Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost(). PR-URL: #17466 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Merged
gibfahn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 20, 2017
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the test using common.PORT gets it. Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost(). PR-URL: #17466 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Member
|
Should this be backported to |
Trott
added a commit
to Trott/io.js
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 20, 2017
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the test using common.PORT gets it. Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost(). PR-URL: nodejs#17466 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
2 tasks
Member
Author
Closed
gibfahn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 20, 2017
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the test using common.PORT gets it. Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost(). PR-URL: #17466 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Merged
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 20, 2017
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the test using common.PORT gets it. Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost(). Backport-PR-URL: #17771 PR-URL: #17466 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Merged
gibfahn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 20, 2017
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the test using common.PORT gets it. Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost(). PR-URL: #17466 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
9 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is
problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to
get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the
test using common.PORT gets it.
Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost().
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
test