tools: avoid using process.cwd in tools/lint-js#17121
Closed
tniessen wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom
Closed
tools: avoid using process.cwd in tools/lint-js#17121tniessen wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom
tniessen wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom
Conversation
The first occurrence of path.join() can easily be replaced with path.resolve(). The second occurrence should be unnecessary as ESLint will resolve the path internally, and the old check probably did not work as intended anyway.
lpinca
approved these changes
Nov 19, 2017
tniessen
added
the
author ready
cjihrig
approved these changes
Nov 19, 2017
Member
|
@tniessen Would you mind kicking off CI when you add that label? :) |
Member
Author
|
@addaleax I kicked off CI before creating the PR, the link is in the description. Unless, of course, |
2 tasks
Member
|
@tniessen Ah – Yeah, I didn’t see that because it didn’t show up in the github display here, but that makes sense if you used node-test-commit directly 👍 |
refack
approved these changes
Nov 20, 2017
jasnell
approved these changes
Nov 20, 2017
Member
Author
|
Landed in f82f5a4. |
tniessen
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2017
The first occurrence of path.join() can easily be replaced with path.resolve(). The second occurrence should be unnecessary as ESLint will resolve the path internally, and the old check probably did not work as intended anyway. PR-URL: #17121 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
addaleax
removed
the
author ready
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2017
The first occurrence of path.join() can easily be replaced with path.resolve(). The second occurrence should be unnecessary as ESLint will resolve the path internally, and the old check probably did not work as intended anyway. PR-URL: #17121 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Merged
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 19, 2017
The first occurrence of path.join() can easily be replaced with path.resolve(). The second occurrence should be unnecessary as ESLint will resolve the path internally, and the old check probably did not work as intended anyway. PR-URL: #17121 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
gibfahn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 19, 2017
The first occurrence of path.join() can easily be replaced with path.resolve(). The second occurrence should be unnecessary as ESLint will resolve the path internally, and the old check probably did not work as intended anyway. PR-URL: #17121 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Closed
gibfahn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 20, 2017
The first occurrence of path.join() can easily be replaced with path.resolve(). The second occurrence should be unnecessary as ESLint will resolve the path internally, and the old check probably did not work as intended anyway. PR-URL: #17121 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Merged
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
9 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The first occurrence of
path.join()can be replaced withpath.resolve(). The second occurrence should be unnecessary as ESLint will resolve the path internally, and the old check probably did not work as intended anyway.CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-linter/13675/
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
tools