doc: add note about python installer#13881
Conversation
nodejs-github-bot
added
build
refack
added
the
meta
|
|
||
| * [Python 2.6 or 2.7](https://www.python.org/downloads/) | ||
| * [Python 2.6 or 2.7](https://www.python.org/downloads/) | ||
| *Note*: It is recommanded to include the "Add python.exe to path" option |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
recommanded -> recommended ?
Is it a too soft word? Does not build fail without this option?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So maybe we should add a note about the alternative ("add it to %Path% manually") if the #13882 has any chance to not cover all the cases.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
add a note about the alternative ("add it to %Path% manually")
🤔 I don't like "spoon feeding" devs, so I need to think about this.
P.S. The installer will register the installation so #13882 should cover that. (To avoid that I have a special tool that extracts msi files so I can xcopy the extracted files to where I like, and then I do what's necessary for my system to work.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm fine with #13882 landing rather than this note.
I like spoon feeding devs when it comes to tooling (and not code) - I don't want the fact building is hard or unclear to prevent contributors from joining.
mscdex
removed
the
meta
refack
changed the title
|
Superseded by #13900 |
5 participants
Ref: nodejs/CTC#147 (comment)
Checklist
Affected core subsystem(s)
doc,meta