doc: correct dgram's Socket.bind required args#11025
Closed
strugee wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom
Closed
doc: correct dgram's Socket.bind required args#11025strugee wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom
strugee wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom
Conversation
nodejs-github-bot
added
dgram
sam-github
suggested changes
Jan 27, 2017
doc/api/dgram.md
Outdated
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I know its not your text, but could you add after
If
portis not specified
"or is 0"
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unfortunately, socket.bind(port) and socket.bind(options) have cut-n-pasted docs, so you need to change in both places (or document the number variant by referring to the options variant).
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@sam-github pushed another fix. As a bonus I synced up some additional information that was missing from the options form.
sam-github
suggested changes
Jan 27, 2017
doc/api/dgram.md
Outdated
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unfortunately, socket.bind(port) and socket.bind(options) have cut-n-pasted docs, so you need to change in both places (or document the number variant by referring to the options variant).
`port` was listed as required, but as described in the following paragraphs, it's actually not. Also, note that setting `port` to `0` will also cause the OS to assign a a random port and sync up the docs of both forms.
Contributor
Author
|
@sam-github ping - this should be good to merge, no? |
jasnell
approved these changes
Jan 31, 2017
sam-github
approved these changes
Jan 31, 2017
Contributor
|
Landed in 89e40c1, thanks. |
sam-github
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2017
`port` was listed as required, but as described in the following paragraphs, it's actually not. Also, note that setting `port` to `0` will also cause the OS to assign a a random port and sync up the docs of both forms. PR-URL: #11025 Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
evanlucas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2017
`port` was listed as required, but as described in the following paragraphs, it's actually not. Also, note that setting `port` to `0` will also cause the OS to assign a a random port and sync up the docs of both forms. PR-URL: #11025 Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
jasnell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 7, 2017
`port` was listed as required, but as described in the following paragraphs, it's actually not. Also, note that setting `port` to `0` will also cause the OS to assign a a random port and sync up the docs of both forms. PR-URL: #11025 Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
jasnell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 7, 2017
`port` was listed as required, but as described in the following paragraphs, it's actually not. Also, note that setting `port` to `0` will also cause the OS to assign a a random port and sync up the docs of both forms. PR-URL: #11025 Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2017
`port` was listed as required, but as described in the following paragraphs, it's actually not. Also, note that setting `port` to `0` will also cause the OS to assign a a random port and sync up the docs of both forms. PR-URL: #11025 Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Merged
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2017
`port` was listed as required, but as described in the following paragraphs, it's actually not. Also, note that setting `port` to `0` will also cause the OS to assign a a random port and sync up the docs of both forms. PR-URL: #11025 Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
portwas listed as required, but as described in the following paragraphs, it's actually not.Checklist
Affected core subsystem(s)
doc