Closed
Conversation
targos
approved these changes
Dec 24, 2016
Member
targos
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM. I trust that you found all occurrences.
gibfahn
approved these changes
Dec 24, 2016
lpinca
approved these changes
Dec 26, 2016
doc/guides/maintaining-V8.md
Outdated
| # Background | ||
|
|
||
| V8 follows the Chromium release schedule. The support horizon for Chromium is very different from the support horizon that Node.js needs to provide to its users. As a result Node.js needs to support a version of V8 for quite a bit longer than what upstream needs to support. Since V8 doesn't have an LTS supported branch, there is no official process around how the V8 branches in Node are maintained. | ||
| V8 follows the Chromium release schedule. The support horizon for Chromium is very different from the support horizon that Node.js needs to provide to its users. As a result Node.js needs to support a version of V8 for quite a bit longer than what upstream needs to support. Since V8 doesn't have an LTS supported branch, there is no official process around how the V8 branches in Node.js are maintained. |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we break the lines at 80 chars?
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For simple text paragraphs, I've now wrapped to 80 chars.
(I didn't do it for lists and anything with interesting formatting because I don't trust my editor to not break something. If anyone feels strongly enough about it and wants to wrap the bulleted lists and paragraphs with links and whatnot, by all means, feel free to make the change and push to this branch.)
jasnell
approved these changes
Dec 27, 2016
jasnell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 27, 2016
PR-URL: #10438 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Member
|
Landed in 0dc09eb |
evanlucas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2017
PR-URL: #10438 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
evanlucas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 4, 2017
PR-URL: #10438 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2017
PR-URL: #10438 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2017
PR-URL: #10438 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2017
PR-URL: #10438 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2017
PR-URL: #10438 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2017
PR-URL: #10438 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2017
PR-URL: #10438 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 1, 2017
PR-URL: #10438 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist
Affected core subsystem(s)
doc
Description of change
If someone knows where it's documented that we refer to the project as
Node.jsrather thanNode, I'd love to include it as a Refs: link in the commit. @mikeal @nodejs/documentation