chore(records)!: Migrate data classes to records#759
Conversation
This is a breaking change, but records are the structures intended to be used for pure data objects. Signed-off-by: Stefan Niedermann <info@niedermann.it>
|
Well, I'd it is fine to do and also we can simply bump to v2.0.0 to comply with semantic versioning. It is a library after all, so it is also fine to just move forward and do such changes. The number of apps making use of the lib is still relatively small and if the breaking change is easy to adapt to, that is even better then 👍 |
|
Hello there, We hope that the review process is going smooth and is helpful for you. We want to ensure your pull request is reviewed to your satisfaction. If you have a moment, our community management team would very much appreciate your feedback on your experience with this PR review process. Your feedback is valuable to us as we continuously strive to improve our community developer experience. Please take a moment to complete our short survey by clicking on the following link: https://cloud.nextcloud.com/apps/forms/s/i9Ago4EQRZ7TWxjfmeEpPkf6 Thank you for contributing to Nextcloud and we hope to hear from you soon! (If you believe you should not receive this message, you can add yourself to the blocklist.) |
This is a (small and easy to adapt) breaking change, but records are the structures intended to be used for pure data objects.
Note: The
FilesAppTypeRegistryitself introduced in1.3.0was a breaking change, too.