Control strategy#95
Conversation
- minor update
|
is this a request for a review? |
|
Sorry for the confusion, is just to go with the issue #94, I will keep it open until revision. It contains the same information. |
|
ok |
|
Can I keep it open as a draft maybe to avoid confusion but to have the branch open for update and revision? |
|
that's fine. |
|
Here a summary of all the updates in the current PR, the column "change" indicate any change in the control strategy topics (new, move to a new tier, deprecated (noted removed in the table)). I also have some open question in the Notes column: The issue #99 , is also still ongoing and I will update the PR once resolved.
|
|
I will try to look at this tomorrow, but it looks very thorough and impressive - thanks! |
|
@LucieContamin, this looks very good. One minor comment. Population treatment Census. You asked how it algns with individual treatment control strategy. I think the two things are quite different. For one, population treatment census is a count, while individual treatment control strategy is a concept. This gets back to the difference between "X" and "census of x". These should be distinct. The other issue is that individual treatment control strategy is designed to be aiming at individual persons. If you look at its parent - infectious disease control strategy , you'll sae lots of control strategies, many of which are population level, so this one stands out as being individual. I assume we'll keep open until #99 is addressed? |
fixes #92 , #93 , #91 , #94