From Fedora:
curl https://getfedora.org/static/fedora.gpg | gpg --import
gpg --verify-files *-CHECKSUM
gpg : Good signature from "Fedora (32) .... "
gpg: not a detached signature; file blahblah.iso was NOT verified
sha256sum -c *-CHECKSUM
sha256sum: WARNING: 21 of 21 computed checksums did NOT match while doing a sha256sum manually of the iso and comparing with the SHA256SUM file line shows the same hash obtained by validating manually fro command line...
What do we do with that?
@MrChromebox, any thoughts?
Not directly linked to #784 but this prohibited me to test directly your PR, since ISO boot was supposed to work. (Fedora, QubesOS and Tails can boot from iso if detached signed file is provided side by side with iso. No idea exactly when Fedora changed but even their archive repos have -CHECKSUM now and no .iso.asc nor .iso.sig.
From Fedora:
sha256sum: WARNING: 21 of 21 computed checksums did NOT matchwhile doing a sha256sum manually of the iso and comparing with the SHA256SUM file line shows the same hash obtained by validating manually fro command line...What do we do with that?
gpg --verify-filesdoesn't work, probably from gpg changes since reverted to gpg 2.2.10sha256sum -vdoesn't work since we depend on busybox, not linux directly build binaries.@MrChromebox, any thoughts?
Not directly linked to #784 but this prohibited me to test directly your PR, since ISO boot was supposed to work. (Fedora, QubesOS and Tails can boot from iso if detached signed file is provided side by side with iso. No idea exactly when Fedora changed but even their archive repos have
-CHECKSUMnow and no.iso.ascnor.iso.sig.