softirqs: Combined CPU as part of the key is necessary to avoid amiss…#2804
Merged
Conversation
… value. In the environment of massive software interrupts. <idle>-0 [003] ..s1 106.421020: softirq_entry: vec=6 [action=TASKLET] <idle>-0 [000] ..s1 106.421063: softirq_entry: vec=3 [action=NET_RX] <idle>-0 [003] ..s1 106.421083: softirq_exit: vec=6 [action=TASKLET] Follow the above ftrace logs, we know the correct vec-6 start timestamp is replaced with incorrect vec-3. Because PID is idle-0. It will produce the wrong result after calculating delta.
Collaborator
|
[buildbot, test this please] |
ismhong
added a commit
to ismhong/bcc
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2021
Currently, hardirqs use tid as key to store information while tracepoint irq_handler_entry. It works fine if irq is triggered while normal task running, but there is a chance causing overwrite issue while irq is triggered while idle task (a.k.a swapper/x, tid=0) running on multi-core system. Let's say there are two irq event trigger simultaneously on both CPU core, irq A @ core #0, irq B @ core #1, and system load is pretty light, so BPF program will get tid=0 since current task is swapper/x for both cpu core. In this case, the information of first irq event stored in map could be overwritten by incoming second irq event. Use tid and cpu_id together to make sure the key is unique for each event in this corner case. Please check more detail at merge request iovisor#2804, iovisor#3733.
yonghong-song
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2021
Currently, hardirqs use tid as key to store information while tracepoint irq_handler_entry. It works fine if irq is triggered while normal task running, but there is a chance causing overwrite issue while irq is triggered while idle task (a.k.a swapper/x, tid=0) running on multi-core system. Let's say there are two irq event trigger simultaneously on both CPU core, irq A @ core #0, irq B @ core #1, and system load is pretty light, so BPF program will get tid=0 since current task is swapper/x for both cpu core. In this case, the information of first irq event stored in map could be overwritten by incoming second irq event. Use tid and cpu_id together to make sure the key is unique for each event in this corner case. Please check more detail at merge request #2804, #3733.
CrackerCat
pushed a commit
to CrackerCat/bcc
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2024
Currently, hardirqs use tid as key to store information while tracepoint irq_handler_entry. It works fine if irq is triggered while normal task running, but there is a chance causing overwrite issue while irq is triggered while idle task (a.k.a swapper/x, tid=0) running on multi-core system. Let's say there are two irq event trigger simultaneously on both CPU core, irq A @ core #0, irq B @ core iovisor#1, and system load is pretty light, so BPF program will get tid=0 since current task is swapper/x for both cpu core. In this case, the information of first irq event stored in map could be overwritten by incoming second irq event. Use tid and cpu_id together to make sure the key is unique for each event in this corner case. Please check more detail at merge request iovisor#2804, iovisor#3733.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
… value.
In the environment of massive software interrupts.
-0 [003] ..s1 106.421020: softirq_entry: vec=6 [action=TASKLET]
-0 [000] ..s1 106.421063: softirq_entry: vec=3 [action=NET_RX]
-0 [003] ..s1 106.421083: softirq_exit: vec=6 [action=TASKLET]
Follow the above ftrace logs, we know the correct vec-6 start timestamp is replaced with incorrect vec-3.
Because PID is idle-0. It will produce the wrong result after calculating delta.