Ethos ELRS GPS Position not in telemetry

[jasc76]

Current Behavior

GPS sensor in Ethos telemetry not populated
tried deleting all sensors but still not working. Sensor is found with value --- and ID02
Sat fix is working, other sensor seem fine

Steps to Reproduce

Tried Inav 8.0.1 and 9.0.1
ELRS 3 (3.5.6)
Ethos 26
Get GPS fix
GPS sensor shows "---"

Expected behavior

GPS sensor delivers current position

Additional context

I already found #9868 and #10907
But also setting set frsky_use_legacy_gps_mode_sensor_ids = on doesnt fix it.

---

• FC Board name and vendor: Matekf405SE
• INAV version string: 9.0.2

[sensei-hacker]

Do you see the GPS with a solid fix the GPS tab of Configurator?

[jasc76]

I have more than 8 satellites fix

[sensei-hacker]

Do you see the attitude data in the telemetry - roll, pitch, and yaw?

[jasc76]

Yes, also current, voltage, number of sats, gps speed, gps height. So all gps fields but position (lat/long)

[b14ckyy]

Weird thing. I don't think its an ethos issue as you say you also don't see data in the raw sensor so ETHOS has nothing to work with, in the first place.
But since no one else reported that issue with CRSF telemetry so far since the 8.0 release I assume there is an issue in your ELRS setup maybe.

[jasc76]

I need to check more builds and yes its weird. ELRS also just takes CRSF and transmits it. And all other telemetry is fine. I also deleted all sensors and tried again with no success.
Maybe its because of the change that happend to CRSF? wasn't there a new version because of the RM sensor lineup? From what I read in another context, Ethos should not be affected. But this is also just a guess.

[jasc76]

can be closed
Its a bug in Ethos 26 nightly
tested on Ethos 1.6.4 with the same model, same module and gps postion is populated

[b14ckyy]

so CRSF issue in the nightly? I run 26.1 nightly with internal R9 and it works fine.

[jasc76]

so CRSF issue in the nightly? I run 26.1 nightly with internal R9 and it works fine.

see issue FrSkyRC/ETHOS-Feedback-Community#5864 (comment)