fix(ci): repoint codeql-action at a SHA that exists - #43
Conversation
github/codeql-action@29b1f65 is pinned here but exists in no repository -- the GitHub API returns 422 for it. CodeQL therefore could not start: the run graph fails to build and the job reports startup_failure, so this repository has had no CodeQL scanning at all. Repointed at 4187e74d05793876e9989daffde9c3e66b4acd07, which is what the v3 tag currently resolves to (v3.37.3), verified against the API. Found while auditing the estate: the same non-existent SHA is pinned in over 100 repositories, so CodeQL is dead across nearly all of them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan D.A. Jewell <6759885+hyperpolymath@users.noreply.github.com>
|
You are seeing this message because GitHub Code Scanning has recently been set up for this repository, or this pull request contains the workflow file for the Code Scanning tool. What Enabling Code Scanning Means:
For more information about GitHub Code Scanning, check out the documentation. |
|
Note Automatic reviews are paused because your trial's included automatic processing has been used for this period. Upgrade now, or comment "Gitar review" to run a review anytime. CI failed: CI failures caused by a duplicate recipe in the Justfile, a trust manifest checksum mismatch, and a Hypatia governance violation for banned ReScript files.OverviewMultiple distinct CI checks failed across the build jobs: a Justfile compilation error due to a duplicate recipe definition, a component trust manifest checksum mismatch, and a Hypatia governance check failure detecting banned ReScript source files. FailuresJustfile Duplicate Recipe Definition (confidence: high)
Trust Manifest Checksum Mismatch (confidence: high)
Hypatia Governance Banned Language Violation (confidence: high)
Summary
Code Review ✅ Approved 2 resolved / 2 findingsUpdates CodeQL action workflows to use a valid SHA and bumps the squisher-corpus dependency, but guix.scm mislabels the repository and contains a license mismatch. ✅ 2 resolved✅ Bug: guix.scm mislabels the vexometer repo as squisher-corpus
✅ Quality: License mismatch: SPDX header MPL-2.0 vs license field PMPL-1.0-or-later
Tip Comment OptionsDisplay: compact → Showing less information. Comment with these commands to change the behavior for this request:
Was this helpful? React with 👍 / 👎 | Gitar |
github/codeql-action@29b1f65c1f735799893313399435a59f54045865is pinned here but exists in no repository — the GitHub API returns 422 for it.CodeQL therefore could not start: the run graph fails to build and the job reports
startup_failure, so this repository has had no CodeQL scanning at all.Repointed at
4187e74d05793876e9989daffde9c3e66b4acd07, which is what thev3tag currently resolves to (v3.37.3), verified against the API.Found while auditing the estate: the same non-existent SHA was pinned in 104 repositories, so CodeQL was dead across nearly all of them.
Summary by Gitar
CodeQLworkflow with pinnedcodeql-actionversionsguix.scmpackage definition forsquisher-corpusThis will update automatically on new commits.