fix(ci): repoint codeql-action at a SHA that exists

[hyperpolymath]

github/codeql-action@29b1f65c1f735799893313399435a59f54045865 is pinned here but exists in no repository — the GitHub API returns 422 for it.

CodeQL therefore could not start: the run graph fails to build and the job reports startup_failure, so this repository has had no CodeQL scanning at all.

Repointed at 4187e74d05793876e9989daffde9c3e66b4acd07, which is what the v3 tag currently resolves to (v3.37.3), verified against the API.

Found while auditing the estate: the same non-existent SHA was pinned in 104 repositories, so CodeQL was dead across nearly all of them.

---

Summary by Gitar

• CI & Compliance:
  • Added CodeQL analysis workflow and Dependabot configuration
  • Added check-no-vlang.sh script and guix.scm files across multiple subpaths
• Governance:
  • Removed duplicate GOVERNANCE.adoc file in favor of GOVERNANCE.md

_{This will update automatically on new commits.}

[gitar-bot]

Note

Automatic reviews are paused because your trial's included automatic processing has been used for this period. Upgrade now, or comment "Gitar review" to run a review anytime.
Learn more

Code Review ✅ Approved 1 resolved / 1 findings

Repoints the CodeQL workflow at a valid SHA to restore security scanning, but the Guix license constructor is called with the wrong arity, causing a compilation failure.

✅ 1 resolved

✅ Bug: guix.scm license constructor called with wrong arity

📄 deno/guix.scm:17-18 📄 gleam/guix.scm:17-18 📄 ex/guix.scm:17-18 📄 haskell/guix.scm:17-18 📄 rs/guix.scm:17-18 📄 showcase/guix.scm:17-18 📄 validate-action/guix.scm:17-18
The license record constructor from (guix licenses), accessed via (@@ (guix licenses) license), requires three arguments (license name uri comment), but here it is invoked with only two (name and uri). Evaluating this file will raise a "wrong number of arguments" error, so the documented guix shell -f guix.scm usage fails for all seven new package definitions. Add the missing comment argument, e.g. ((@@ (guix licenses) license) "PMPL-1.0-or-later" "https://github.com/hyperpolymath/palimpsest-license" "Palimpsest License").

Options

Display: compact → Showing less information.

Comment with these commands to change the behavior for this request:

Compact

gitar display:verbose

_{Was this helpful? React with 👍 / 👎 | Gitar}

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
1 New issue
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[github-advanced-security]

You are seeing this message because GitHub Code Scanning has recently been set up for this repository, or this pull request contains the workflow file for the Code Scanning tool.

What Enabling Code Scanning Means:

• The 'Security' tab will display more code scanning analysis results (e.g., for the default branch).
• Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results.
• You will be able to see the analysis results for the pull request's branch on this overview once the scans have completed and the checks have passed.

For more information about GitHub Code Scanning, check out the documentation.