Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 20, 2026. It is now read-only.

feat: added unit test with coverage of 68 %#611

Merged
c24t merged 12 commits intogoogleapis:masterfrom
vi3k6i5:unit_tests_2
May 17, 2021
Merged

feat: added unit test with coverage of 68 %#611
c24t merged 12 commits intogoogleapis:masterfrom
vi3k6i5:unit_tests_2

Conversation

@vi3k6i5
Copy link
Contributor

@vi3k6i5 vi3k6i5 commented Apr 22, 2021

feat: added unit test with coverage of 60 %

@vi3k6i5 vi3k6i5 requested a review from a team April 22, 2021 16:37
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the api: spanner Issues related to the googleapis/python-spanner-django API. label Apr 22, 2021
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Apr 22, 2021
@vi3k6i5 vi3k6i5 requested review from larkee and skuruppu April 22, 2021 16:37
@vi3k6i5 vi3k6i5 force-pushed the unit_tests_2 branch 2 times, most recently from b0f0e88 to 2391801 Compare April 24, 2021 18:16
@vi3k6i5 vi3k6i5 changed the title feat: added unit test with coverage of 75 % feat: added unit test with coverage of 70 % Apr 24, 2021
vi3k6i5 added 4 commits April 25, 2021 17:55
fix: Remove un necessary file from code base (googleapis#608)
feat: move migrations test modules to run against different emulator …
feat: update workflow files to uniformly distribute the test modules …
feat: update docs and nox file to compile it (googleapis#610)
@vi3k6i5 vi3k6i5 requested review from c24t, larkee and thiagotnunes April 28, 2021 16:57
@vi3k6i5 vi3k6i5 linked an issue May 4, 2021 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Contributor

@c24t c24t left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few comments on test organization and style, but the tests themselves look great and this is a big obvious improvement.

I'll have to take another pass to check the test logic in more detail, but the tests I've checked so far all LGTM.

@larkee may have some insight on test strategy from python-spanner.

@vi3k6i5 vi3k6i5 force-pushed the unit_tests_2 branch 2 times, most recently from 96170b4 to b4a8831 Compare May 5, 2021 13:48
@vi3k6i5 vi3k6i5 requested a review from c24t May 6, 2021 16:13
@vi3k6i5 vi3k6i5 changed the title feat: added unit test with coverage of 70 % feat: added unit test with coverage of 68 % May 7, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@c24t c24t left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tests look great, thanks for the updates

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

api: spanner Issues related to the googleapis/python-spanner-django API. cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Dedicated unit tests for django_spanner

3 participants