Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @Jacksunwei, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request integrates the changes from release v0.4.1 into the main branch. It primarily updates version numbers in relevant configuration and source files and incorporates the detailed changelog entries for the 0.4.1 release, which includes several bug fixes related to the automated release workflow. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request merges the v0.4.1 release into the main branch. The changes, which include version bumps in configuration and source files and an updated CHANGELOG, are consistent with a release process. My review includes one suggestion regarding a formatting change in a configuration file to improve maintainability.
| "changelog-sections": [ | ||
| {"type": "feat", "section": "Features"}, | ||
| {"type": "fix", "section": "Bug Fixes"}, | ||
| {"type": "perf", "section": "Performance Improvements"}, | ||
| {"type": "refactor", "section": "Code Refactoring"}, | ||
| {"type": "docs", "section": "Documentation"}, | ||
| {"type": "test", "section": "Tests", "hidden": true}, | ||
| {"type": "build", "section": "Build System", "hidden": true}, | ||
| {"type": "ci", "section": "CI/CD", "hidden": true}, | ||
| {"type": "style", "section": "Styles", "hidden": true}, | ||
| {"type": "chore", "section": "Miscellaneous Chores", "hidden": true} | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "feat", | ||
| "section": "Features" | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "fix", | ||
| "section": "Bug Fixes" | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "perf", | ||
| "section": "Performance Improvements" | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "refactor", | ||
| "section": "Code Refactoring" | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "docs", | ||
| "section": "Documentation" | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "test", | ||
| "section": "Tests", | ||
| "hidden": true | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "build", | ||
| "section": "Build System", | ||
| "hidden": true | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "ci", | ||
| "section": "CI/CD", | ||
| "hidden": true | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "style", | ||
| "section": "Styles", | ||
| "hidden": true | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "type": "chore", | ||
| "section": "Miscellaneous Chores", | ||
| "hidden": true | ||
| } | ||
| ] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This formatting change introduces a large diff with no functional change, making the file significantly longer and adding noise to the commit history. To improve maintainability, it's beneficial to avoid large, purely stylistic changes. Please consider reverting this formatting change to keep the configuration concise. If this new format is desired, it would be best to adopt a consistent formatter for the project to prevent such diffs in the future.
1 participant
Syncs version bump and CHANGELOG from release v0.4.1 to main.