Skip to content

test#581

Open
akanshaaa19 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
test
Open

test#581
akanshaaa19 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
test

Conversation

@akanshaaa19
Copy link
Member

@akanshaaa19 akanshaaa19 commented Feb 27, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the release workflow to trigger on pull requests instead of pushes to the main branch.
    • Added automatic upload of merged documentation as an artifact with 30-day retention.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 27, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Modified the GitHub Actions workflow to trigger on pull requests instead of push events on the main branch, and added a new step to upload the merged documentation file as a workflow artifact with a 30-day retention period.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Workflow Configuration
.github/workflows/export_and_update.yml
Changed trigger event from push to pull_request on main branch; added final artifact upload step for merged_documentation.md with 30-day retention using actions/upload-artifact@v4.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 A workflow hops from push to pull,
Now checking PRs when change is full,
Documentation bundled with care,
Artifacts saved in the CI air! 📦✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'test' is vague and generic, failing to describe any meaningful aspect of the changeset which modifies workflow triggers and adds artifact upload functionality. Use a descriptive title that summarizes the actual changes, such as 'Update workflow to trigger on pull requests and add documentation artifact upload'.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch test

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In @.github/workflows/export_and_update.yml:
- Around line 4-5: The workflow currently triggers on pull_request for main
which allows unmerged PRs to run destructive Step 5 (vector-store
delete/replace); change the trigger or add a guard so only pushes to main can
perform mutations: keep pull_request for building/artifact steps but wrap the
destructive job/step (referenced as Step 5 / the vector-store update step) with
a condition such as if: github.event_name == 'push' && github.ref ==
'refs/heads/main' or move the vector-store update into a separate workflow
triggered only on push to main so PRs (and forked PRs without secrets) cannot
mutate production data.

ℹ️ Review info

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d478d16 and 8ececb9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/export_and_update.yml

Comment on lines +4 to 5
pull_request:
branches: [main]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

Restrict production vector-store mutations to post-merge events

Line 4 now runs this workflow on every PR update, but Step 5 performs destructive external operations (delete + replace in the vector store). That allows unmerged PR code to mutate production data and can also fail on fork PRs due to missing secrets.

🔧 Suggested fix (keep artifact on PR, run vector-store update only on push to main)
 on:
   pull_request:
     branches: [main]
+  push:
+    branches: [main]
@@
       # Step 5: Upload to Vector Store
       - name: Upload to Vector Store
+        if: github.event_name == 'push'
         env:
           OPENAI_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.OPENAI_API_KEY }}
           VECTOR_STORE_ID: ${{ secrets.VECTOR_STORE_ID }}
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In @.github/workflows/export_and_update.yml around lines 4 - 5, The workflow
currently triggers on pull_request for main which allows unmerged PRs to run
destructive Step 5 (vector-store delete/replace); change the trigger or add a
guard so only pushes to main can perform mutations: keep pull_request for
building/artifact steps but wrap the destructive job/step (referenced as Step 5
/ the vector-store update step) with a condition such as if: github.event_name
== 'push' && github.ref == 'refs/heads/main' or move the vector-store update
into a separate workflow triggered only on push to main so PRs (and forked PRs
without secrets) cannot mutate production data.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant