[performance] Regression in CompileSimpleWorkflow: 269% slower

[github-actions]

📊 Performance Regression Detected

Benchmark: CompileSimpleWorkflow

Current Performance: 12,308,148 ns/op (12.31ms)
Historical Average: 3,332,437 ns/op (3.33ms)
Change: +269.3% slower

📈 Detailed Performance Metrics

Performance Comparison

• ns/op: 12,308,148 (was 3,332,437)
• Change: +269.3%
• Bytes/op: 6,142,837 B/op (was ~855,460 B/op)
• Allocs/op: 68,489 allocs/op (was ~5,297 allocs/op)
• Historical Data Points: 5

Baseline Targets

• Simple workflows: <100ms ✅ (still within target but 3.7× slower vs history)

💡 Recommended Actions

1. Review recent changes to the compilation pipeline (regression began ~June 11)
2. Run make bench-memory to generate memory profiles
3. Use go tool pprof to identify hotspots — memory also regressed 7× (855KB → 6.1MB)
4. Compare with previous benchmark results: benchstat

📋 Additional Context

• Run ID: §27426858123
• Date: 2026-06-12
• Workflow: Daily CLI Performance
• First seen: 2026-06-11 (9.72ms), worsened 2026-06-12 (12.31ms)

---

Automatically generated by Daily CLI Performance workflow

Generated by ⚡ Daily CLI Performance Agent · 270 AIC · ⌖ 28.9 AIC · ⊞ 23.9K · ◷

• expires on Jun 14, 2026, 8:02 AM UTC-08:00

[github-actions]

🍪 Issue Monster selected this for Copilot

I've identified this issue as a good candidate for automated resolution and requested assignment to the Copilot coding agent.

If assignment succeeds, the Copilot coding agent will analyze the issue and create a pull request with the fix.

Om nom nom! 🍪

🍪 Om nom nom by Issue Monster · 40 AIC · ⌖ 12.7 AIC · ⊞ 24.4K · ◷

[copilot-swe-agent]

The agent encountered an error and was unable to start working on this issue: Please try again later, or contact support if the problem persists. (Request id: 2000:20184F:854E493:1F3B6063:6A2C9F6D)

[github-actions]

This issue was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-06-14T16:02:36.578Z.

Closed by Workflow