CI Failure Investigation - Run #37824
Summary
The fuzz job in run 22395803036 was cancelled not because a test failed but because a newer CI run (#37826) started while the 25 fuzz targets were still executing. The concurrency guard ci-$\{\{ github.ref }}-fuzz with cancel-in-progress: true intentionally aborts the older job so the latest push on main can take over.
Failure Details
Root Cause Analysis
Run 22395803036 (CI #37824) was still executing the fuzz suite when a subsequent push to main kicked off run 22395928374 (CI #37826, "deps: update golang.org/x/tools from v0.41.0 to v0.42.0 (#18319)"). Because the job is in the ci-$\{\{ github.ref }}-fuzz concurrency group with cancel-in-progress: true, GitHub immediately cancelled the earlier Run fuzz tests step and marked the job as cancelled once the newer run began.
Failed Jobs and Errors
- fuzz –
Run fuzz tests step aborted due to the concurrency guard, which leaves the log at ##[error]The operation was canceled. even though each fuzz target was running as expected.
Investigation Findings
Recommended Actions
Prevention Strategies
Document for future investigations that fuzz jobs on main are protected by ci-$\{\{ github.ref }}-fuzz with cancel-in-progress, so any cancellation usually signals that a newer run started immediately afterwards.
AI Team Self-Improvement
Before diagnosing fuzz test failures, check the ci-refs/heads/main-fuzz concurrency group and mention whether a newer run (ID, number, and starting commit) overtook the previous one; that will save time hunting for actual bugs.
Historical Context
🩺 Diagnosis provided by CI Failure Doctor
To install this workflow, run gh aw add githubnext/agentics/workflows/ci-doctor.md@ea350161ad5dcc9624cf510f134c6a9e39a6f94d. View source at https://github.com/githubnext/agentics/tree/ea350161ad5dcc9624cf510f134c6a9e39a6f94d/workflows/ci-doctor.md.
CI Failure Investigation - Run #37824
Summary
The
fuzzjob in run 22395803036 was cancelled not because a test failed but because a newerCIrun (#37826) started while the 25 fuzz targets were still executing. The concurrency guardci-$\{\{ github.ref }}-fuzzwithcancel-in-progress: trueintentionally aborts the older job so the latest push onmaincan take over.Failure Details
fuzz→Run fuzz tests(step concluded ascancelled)##[error]The operation was canceled.(2026-02-25T12:01:11Z)Root Cause Analysis
Run 22395803036 (CI #37824) was still executing the fuzz suite when a subsequent push to
mainkicked off run 22395928374 (CI #37826, "deps: update golang.org/x/tools from v0.41.0 to v0.42.0 (#18319)"). Because the job is in theci-$\{\{ github.ref }}-fuzzconcurrency group withcancel-in-progress: true, GitHub immediately cancelled the earlierRun fuzz testsstep and marked the job ascancelledonce the newer run began.Failed Jobs and Errors
Run fuzz testsstep aborted due to the concurrency guard, which leaves the log at##[error]The operation was canceled.even though each fuzz target was running as expected.Investigation Findings
##[error]The operation was canceled.at 2026-02-25T12:01:11Z.-fuzztime=10s, so push events that land during that window will always cancel the prior run.Recommended Actions
fuzzjob) now that run 22395928374 has exclusive access to the concurrency group. No code change is required—the cancellation was deliberate.Prevention Strategies
Document for future investigations that fuzz jobs on
mainare protected byci-$\{\{ github.ref }}-fuzzwithcancel-in-progress, so any cancellation usually signals that a newer run started immediately afterwards.AI Team Self-Improvement
Before diagnosing fuzz test failures, check the
ci-refs/heads/main-fuzzconcurrency group and mention whether a newer run (ID, number, and starting commit) overtook the previous one; that will save time hunting for actual bugs.Historical Context