Skip to content

feat(ci): G3 perf regression gate + allowlist governance docs#293

Merged
flyingrobots merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
fix/close-280-287
Mar 8, 2026
Merged

feat(ci): G3 perf regression gate + allowlist governance docs#293
flyingrobots merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
fix/close-280-287

Conversation

@flyingrobots
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

New files

File Purpose
scripts/check_perf_regression.cjs G3 gate: compare bencher output against baseline, fail on regression
scripts/generate_perf_baseline.cjs Generate perf-baseline.json from criterion bencher output
.github/workflows/perf-baseline-update.yml Auto-PR baseline updates on main push
perf-baseline.json Git-tracked performance baseline (seeded empty; first main push populates)

Test plan

  • Pre-commit: cargo fmt, clippy, markdown lint — clean
  • Pre-push: fmt, clippy, tests, rustdoc, patterns, determinism — all passed
  • check_perf_regression.cjs exits 0 with empty baseline (first-run behavior)
  • CI: det-gates G3 job runs comparison step
  • CI: perf-baseline-update.yml creates baseline PR on first main push

Closes #280
Closes #287

- G3 gate now compares criterion bencher output against git-tracked
  perf-baseline.json, failing on >15% regression (configurable).
- New perf-baseline-update.yml workflow auto-generates baseline update
  PRs on main pushes that touch Rust sources.
- Added check_perf_regression.cjs (gate) and generate_perf_baseline.cjs
  (baseline generation from bencher output).
- Added "Determinism Allowlist Governance" section to RELEASE_POLICY.md
  documenting exemption criteria, approval requirements, and audit cadence.
- Added cross-reference from ban-nondeterminism.sh to governance policy.

Closes #280
Closes #287
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Mar 8, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@flyingrobots has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 2 minutes and 42 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 2567b99f-720d-400f-b6aa-ab75cfb86440

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 78fc92d and 6c039da.

📒 Files selected for processing (8)
  • .github/workflows/det-gates.yml
  • .github/workflows/perf-baseline-update.yml
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • docs/RELEASE_POLICY.md
  • perf-baseline.json
  • scripts/ban-nondeterminism.sh
  • scripts/check_perf_regression.cjs
  • scripts/generate_perf_baseline.cjs
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/close-280-287

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: b94868b54f

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

const report = [];
let regressions = 0;

for (const name of benchNames) {
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Fail when baseline benchmarks disappear from current run

Iterating only Object.keys(current) means the gate never checks benchmarks that exist in perf-baseline.json but are missing from the new output, so a renamed/removed benchmark can silently bypass regression enforcement and still report G3: PASSED. This undermines the accuracy of the regression gate in exactly the cases where benchmark coverage changes, so the comparison should include baseline-only entries (at least as a hard failure or explicit review-required state).

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

- Add step id to "Generate baseline JSON" and wire skip output into
  "Create baseline PR" if-condition (was dead GITHUB_OUTPUT write).
- Add date prefix to baseline branch name to avoid short-SHA collisions.
- Remove redundant git-diff guard (now handled by step skip logic).
- Warn when baseline benchmarks are missing from current criterion run.
- Remove unused path import from check_perf_regression.cjs.
… run

Promote missing-benchmark detection from WARN to FAIL. A benchmark that
exists in perf-baseline.json but is absent from the current criterion
output now counts as a regression, preventing silent bypass via
benchmark renames or removals. Resolution: update perf-baseline.json to
remove the stale entry.

Addresses chatgpt-codex-connector review comment on PR #293.
@flyingrobots
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Fixed in 6c039da: Missing benchmarks now fail G3 gate instead of warn-only. A benchmark present in perf-baseline.json but absent from criterion output counts as a regression with status MISSING. Resolution path: update the baseline to remove the stale entry.

@flyingrobots
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Mar 8, 2026

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@flyingrobots flyingrobots merged commit 971ba5a into main Mar 8, 2026
28 checks passed
@flyingrobots flyingrobots deleted the fix/close-280-287 branch March 8, 2026 09:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

1 participant